Home  - Philosophers - Searle John

Books Baby Camera Phones Computers Games DVD Electronics Kitchen Magazines Music Garden Software Tools Toys Video Apparel & Accessories Jewelry & Watches Musical Instruments Health & Personal Care Beauty Sports & Outdoors Office Products

e99.com Bookstore

Images

Newsgroups

1-20 of 99    1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Searle John:     more books (100)

Mind: A Brief Introduction (Fundamentals of Philosophy) by John R. Searle, 2005-07-28 Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization by John Searle, 2010-01-12 The Mystery of Consciousness by John R. Searle, 1997-09-01 Philosophy in a New Century: Selected Essays by John R. Searle, 2008-12-29 Freedom and Neurobiology: Reflections on Free Will, Language, and Political Power (Columbia Themes in Philosophy) by John Searle, 2008-08-27 Boy Still Missing: A Novel (P.S.) by John Searles, 2005-06-01 Minds, Brains and Science (1984 Reith Lectures) by John Searle, 1986-01-01 Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge Paperback Library) by John R. Searle, 1983-05-31 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language by John R. Searle, 1970-01-01 Mind, Language, and Society : Philosophy in the Real World by John R. Searle, 2000-01-01 The Construction of Social Reality by John R. Searle, 1997-01-01 Strange but True: A Novel (P.S.) by John Searles, 2005-06-01 Rationality in Action (Jean Nicod Lectures) by John R. Searle, 2003-03-01 Consciousness and Language by John R. Searle, 2002-07-15

lists with details

1. Professor John Searle
   http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~jsearle

2. John Searle
   John Searle. Searle (1979) offers a treatment of metaphor from the perspective of speech act theory, in which a statement possesses  
   http://www.compapp.dcu.ie/~tonyv/trinity/searle.html
   
   Extractions: Searle (1979) offers a treatment of metaphor from the perspective of speech act theory, in which a statement possesses both a Speaker Utterance Meaning (SUM) and a Literal Sentence Meaning (LSM). In this model, the SUM of a statement is that meaning the speaker wishes to convey to the hearer, while the LSM is that meaning to be found by analysing the truth conditions of the sentence, independent of the speaker's intentionality. A statement is thus `literal' whenever the SUM and LSM are the same, i.e., the speaker both means what he says and says what he means. A metaphorical utterance, however, as with other rhetorical devices such as irony and hyperbolae, exhibits a rift between SUM and LSM, which is reconciled by the hearer via the construction of a figurative interpretation. When adhering to the social contract that underlies a conversation, the speaker will normally endeavour to minimise the conceptual distance between LSM and SUM, inasmuch as he wishes to be understood by the hearer (this consideration is embodied in the Gricean `Principle of Co- operation' , discussed in Coulthard 1985). From this speech act perspective, literal truth can be viewed as a form of semantic `honesty' or `plainness', that is, the hearer believes the speaker to mean what he says, and thus to say what he means in as co-operative a fashion as possible. Consider, for example, the statement

3. MSN Encarta - Résultats De La Recherche - Searle John Rogers
   searle john Rogers . Page 1 sur 1. Plus de résultats avec MSN pour searle john Rogers .  
   http://fr.encarta.msn.com/Searle_John_Rogers.html
   
   Extractions: Accueil MSN Mon MSN Hotmail Rechercher ... S'abonner   Encarta Premium Rechercher Encarta R©sultats de la recherche pour "Searle John Rogers" Page sur 1 R©serv© aux abonn©s MSN Encarta Premium. Searle, John Rogers Encyclop©die EncartaArticle Searle, John Rogers (1932- ), philosophe am©ricain. intelligence artificielle Encyclop©die EncartaArticle Trouv© dans l'article intelligence artificielle s©rie B Encyclop©die EncartaArticle Trouv© dans l'article s©rie B s©mantique Encyclop©die EncartaArticle Trouv© dans l'article s©mantique Waters, Muddy Encyclop©die EncartaArticle Trouv© dans l'article Waters, Muddy serial Encyclop©die EncartaArticle Trouv© dans l'article serial R©serv© aux abonn©s MSN Encarta Premium. Page sur 1

4. Searle John From FOLDOC
   searle john. history of philosophy, biography American philosopher born in 1932. Expanding on the work of JL Austin, Searle s Speech  
   http://www.swif.uniba.it/lei/foldop/foldoc.cgi?Searle John

5. John Searle - Artist Painting Prices, Art Appraisal, Artist Paintings [AskART.co
   John searle john Searle Videos from Thinking Allowed MINDS, BRAINS AND SCIENCE John Searle ( S493), 30 min. $29.95, Will computers ever achieve consciousness? John Searle, Ph.D., is a  
   http://www.askart.com/artist/S/john_searle.asp?ID=80703

6. World Economic Forum Knowledge Navigator - Searle John R.
   searle john R. Professor of Philosophy of Mind and Language, University of California, Berkeley, USA. University of California, Berkeley.  
   http://www.weforum.org/site/knowledgenavigator.nsf/Content/Searle John R.
   
   Extractions: 1949-52, studies at University of Wisconsin; 1952-55, studies at Oxford University (Rhodes Scholar): 1955, BA , 1959, MA and PhD. 1956-59, Lecturer in Philosophy, Christ Church, Oxford. Since 1959, Faculty Member, University of California, Berkeley. Recipient of four honorary degrees and numerous honours and awards. Author of 11 books including: The Rediscovery of the Mind; The Foundations of Illocutionary Logic; Minds, Brains and Science; Intentionality: an Essay in the Philosophy of Mind; Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts; Speech Acts: an Essay in the Philosophy of Language; The Construction of Social Reality; The Mystery of Consciousness; Mind, Language and Society. Printer friendly version Send to a friend Last updated: 7 October 2002 Privacy Statement About this site var wtl_loc = document.URL.indexOf('https:')==0?'https://a248.e.akamai.net/v/248/2120/1d/download.akamai.com/crs/lgsitewise.js':'http://crs.akamai.com/crs/lgsitewise.js'; document.write(""); var wtl_TagVer = 6; var wtl_FWD = 1; var wtl_url = document.URL; var wtl_title = document.title; var wtl_TagID = 144700; var wtl_SID = "144700"; var wtl_Offset = "100"; WTL_TAG = new Image; WTL_TAG.ID = "WTL_TAG"; var ORDER= ""; var SERVER= ""; var INVOICE= ""; var CARTVIEW= ""; var CARTADD= ""; var CARTREMOVE= ""; var CHECKOUT= ""; var CARTBUY= ""; var ADCAMPAIGN= ""; //wtl_Tag6(TAG,SID,wtl_url,wtl_title,"MainContentGroup,SubContentGroup"); wtl_Tag6(wtl_TagID,wtl_SID,wtl_url,wtl_title);

7. John Searle - Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia
   John Searle. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Speech Acts An essay in the philosophy of language, John Searle, (1969); The Campus War, John Searle, (1971);  
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Searle
   
   Extractions: Log in Help From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. John Searle (born December ) is Mills Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley , and is noted for contributions in the philosophy of language philosophy of mind and consciousness , and on the characteristics of socially constructed versus physical realities. Table of contents showTocToggle("show","hide") 1 Illocutionary force 6 Further reading Searle's early works built on the efforts of his teachers, J. L. Austin and P. F. Strawson . In particular Searle's Speech Acts developed Austin's analysis of performative utterances . Searle focused on what Austin had called illocutionary acts, acts performed in saying something. In this analysis the sentences ( Speech Acts p. 22) Sam smokes habitually does Sam smoke habitually? Sam, smoke habitually! would that Sam smoked habitually each have the same propositional content , Sam smoking, yet they differ in their illocutionary force , respectively a statement, a question, a command and an expression of desire.

8. John Searle JOHN SEARLE John Searle JOHN SEARLE - Antoloji.Com Kitap
   Onbinlerce kitap, konusuna gore, kisiye gore ve yayinevine gore duzenlendi. john, searle, JOHN, SEARLE, john, searle, JOHN, SEARLE,. Çarambula. John Searle.  
   http://www.antoloji.com/kitap/kisi.asp?CAS=32834

9. John R Searle
   searle john R. Dublin,M. Futurehype. Show a social network diagram for this name. The names below are mentioned on the listed pages with the name searle john R.  
   http://www.namebase.org/main2/John-R-Searle.html

10. Big Thinkers - John Searle
    John Searle. John 2002). Articles on KurzweilAI.net written by John Searle Are We Spiritual Machines? Chapter 2 I Married a Computer,  
    http://www.kurzweilai.net/bios/bio0192.html
    
    Extractions: Printable Version John Searle ... John Searle is Mills Professor of the Philosophy of Mind at the University of California at Berkeley and author of many books, including Rationality in Action (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001). He is best know for his Chinese Room analogy , which argues that the mind is not a computer and that the Turing Test is not adequate for determining intelligence . His essay, "I Married a Computer " appears in Are We Spirit ual Machine s? Ray Kurzweil vs. the Critics of Strong AI (Discovery Institute, 2002).

11. John Searle
    John Searle. Books by John Searle. Speech Acts An essay in the philosophy of language(1969); The Campus War(1971); Expression and Meaning (1979);  
    http://www.fact-index.com/j/jo/john_searle.html
    
    Extractions: Main Page See live article Alphabetical index John Searle is Mills Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley , and is noted for contributions in the philosophy of language philosophy of mind and consciousness , and on the characteristics of socially constructed versus physical realities. Searle's early works built on the efforts of his teachers, J. L. Austin and P. F. Strawson . In particular Searle's Speech Acts developed Austin's analysis of performative utterances. Searle focused on what Austin had called illocutionary acts, acts performed in saying something. In this analysis the sentences ( Speech Acts p. 22) Sam smokes habitually does Sam smoke habitually? Sam, smoke habitually! would that Sam smoked habitually each have the same propositional content , Sam smoking, yet they differ in their illocutionary force , respectively a statement, a question, a command and an expression of desire. Searle describes how the illocutionary forces of a sentence can be described as obeying various rules. These rules delimited the propositional content, set the background conditions and assumed intent of the speaker, and reveal what it was the sentence was intended to do. The assumed intent of the speaker, or the intentionality of the sentence, became a prime focus in later work. Intentionality lies at the heart of the

12. John Searle - Encyclopedia Article About John Searle. Free Access, No Registrati
    encyclopedia article about John Searle. John Searle in Free online English dictionary, thesaurus and encyclopedia. Provides John Searle. Word  
    http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/John Searle
    
    Extractions: Click the link for more information. at the University of California, Berkeley The University of California, Berkeley (also UCB Cal Berkeley , or UC Berkeley ) is the oldest campus of the University of California, situated in Berkeley, California on the east side of the San Francisco Bay, overlooking the Golden Gate. There are over 33,000 students enrolled and over 1,900 faculty. In 1866, the land which is now the Click the link for more information. , and is noted for contributions in the philosophy of language The philosophy of language is a branch of philosophy. It does not ask what particular words mean, or whether particular sentences are true (except of course for words and sentences about language). Rather, it asks what the meaning in general is. What are the meanings of the word "meaning"? How do we understand this concept?

13. Book Review Of John Searle
    John Searle THE REDISCOVERY OF THE MIND (MIT Press, 1992) (Copyright © 1999 Piero Scaruffi Legal restrictions Termini d uso ) First review.  
    http://www.thymos.com/mind/searle.html
    
    Extractions: Piero Scaruffi Legal restrictions - Termini d'uso Searle's critique of theories of the mind is based on the lack for a good theory of consciousness. There is no mind without consciousness, and there can be no theory of the mind without a theory of consciousness. All paradoxes of functionalist models arise from having neglected consciousness. Conscious mental states and processes are fundamentally different from anything else in nature because they are "subjective". They are not equally accessible to all observers. They cannot be reduced to more elementary units. Searle believes that the objective properties of the brain cause the subjective ones, i.e. that consciousness is a biological phenomenon, though consciousness can't be reduced to physical states in the brain. This is not "property dualism" because Searle rejects the idea that the universe can be partitioned in physical and mental properties: things such as "ungrammatical sentences, my ability to ski, the government and points scored in football games" cannot be easily categorized as mental or physical. The traditional mental vs physical dichotomy is pointless.

14. Dictionary Of Philosophy Of Mind - Searle, John
    searle, john (b. 1932, Denver, CO; Ph.D. philosophy, Oxford; currently Professor of Philosophy, UC Berkeley.) In philosophy of mind, searle is known for his  
    http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~philos/MindDict/searle.html
    
    Extractions: Searle, John - (b. 1932, Denver, CO; Ph.D. philosophy, Oxford; currently Professor of Philosophy, UC Berkeley.) In philosophy of mind, Searle is known for his critique of computationalism, his theory of intentionality, and his work on the problem of consciousness. See Chinese room intentionality ; intention-in- action; aspectual shape ; prior intention; The Background Critique of Computationalism and Strong AI The Theory of Intentionality The Theory of Consciousness ... References Searle took his Ph.D. in philosophy at Oxford, where he studied under John Austin and later became Lecturer in Philosophy at Christ Church from 1957-1959. Subsequently he went to UC Berkeley, where he became Professor of Philosophy. Searle's early work was in speech act theory, culminating in (1969) and (1979). He is credited with having elaborated the theory of speech acts associated with Austin, and with having introduced into the theory original elements of his own, most notably regarding the role played by speakers' and receivers' intentions in constituting the meaning of speech acts. Consistent with the focus on intentionality, his interest turned to philosophy of mind, where his major work can be seen as consisting in three main efforts: a critique of computationalism and strong Artificial Intelligence (AI); the development of a theory of intentionality; and the formulation of a naturalized theory of consciousness. The Critique of Computationalism and Strong AI The best known example of Searle's critique of computationalism and strong AI is his Chinese Room Argument (see separate entry). The main thrust of this thought experiment was to show that the syntactic manipulation of formal symbols does not by itself constitute a semantics. The implications for computationalism and strong AI were held to be the following: first, computationalism fails because the formal syntax of a computer program has been shown not to be intrinsically semantic, and second, strong AI fails because a system's behaving as if it had mental states is insufficient to establish that it does in fact have these states. Interestingly, Searle's assertion that syntax is insufficient to establish semantics predates the Chinese Room Argument and in fact represents one of the main objections to the generative grammar program that he voiced back in the early 1970s (e.g., 1972).

15. Searle, John
    Glossary of Religion and Philosophy Short Biography of john searle Name john searle. Dates Born 1932 in Denver, Colorado Biography john searle is an American philosopher who is best known for his work on the human mind  
    http://atheism.about.com/library/glossary/general/bldef_searle.htm
    
    Extractions: zJs=10 zJs=11 zJs=12 zJs=13 zc(5,'jsc',zJs,9999999,'') About Agnosticism / Atheism Home Essentials ... Evolution vs. Creationism zau(256,152,145,'gob','http://z.about.com/5/ad/go.htm?gs='+gs,''); Does God Exist? Ethics and Morality Islam and Muslims Religious Right ... Help zau(256,138,125,'el','http://z.about.com/0/ip/417/0.htm','');w(xb+xb); Subscribe to the About Agnosticism / Atheism newsletter. Search Agnosticism / Atheism John Searle Back to Last Page Glossary Index Related Terms mind / body problem John Searle is an American philosopher who is best known for his work on the human mind and human consciousness. According to Searle, the human mind and human consciousness cannot be reduced simply to physical events and brain states. Searle is particularly well known for developing a thought experiment called the "Chinese Room" argument. With this, he thought he could demonstrate that no computer could ever be made which could really "think" in the way we do - specifically, that it could never acquire an "understanding" of events and processes. Imagine sitting alone in the room with a huge book full of Chinese characters. Every so often, someone pushes a piece of paper under the door. You take this paper and find that it has Chinese characters on it. Your job is to match up the characters on the paper with the same characters in the book - in doing so, you fill out a new piece of paper with different Chinese characters on it. You don't understand any Chinese, but you know how to fill out the piece of paper by simply taking the appropriate characters from the book.

16. Minds, Brains, And Programs
    john searle's seminal text on problems with the metaphor of the brain as computing device in which his famous Chinese Room argument is brought forth as criticism of the philosophical foundation for examining human cognition via computer simulation.  
    http://members.aol.com/NeoNoetics/MindsBrainsPrograms.html
    
    Extractions: Minds, Brains, and Programs John R. Searle ["Minds, Brains, and Programs," by John R. Searle, from The Behavioral and Brain Sciences What psychological and philosophical significance should we attach to recent efforts at computer simulations of human cognitive capacities? In answering this question, I find it useful to distinguish what I will call "strong" AI from "weak" or "cautious" AI (artificial intelligence). According to weak AI, the principal value of the computer in the study of the mind is that it gives us a very powerful tool. For example, it enables us to formulate and test hypotheses in a more rigorous and precise fashion. But according to strong AI, the computer is not merely a tool in the study of the mind; rather, the appropriately programmed computer really is a mind, in the sense that computers given the right programs can be literally said to understand and have other cognitive states. In strong AI, because the programmed computer has cognitive states, the programs are not mere tools that enable us to test psychological explanations; rather, the programs are themselves the explanations. I have no objection to the claims of weak AI, at least as far as this article is concerned. My discussion here will be directed at the claims I have defined as those of strong AI, specifically the claim that the appropriately programmed computer literally has cognitive states and that the programs thereby explain human cognition. When I hereafter refer to AI, I have in mind the strong version, as expressed by these two claims.

17. Chinese Room Argument [Internet Encyclopedia Of Philosophy]
    john searle's thought experiment is one of the best known counters to claims of artificial intelligence.  
    http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/c/chineser.htm
    
    Extractions: The Chinese Room Argument The Chinese room argument - John Searle's (1980a) thought experiment and associated (1984) derivation - is one of the best known and widely credited counters to claims of artificial intelligence (AI), i.e., to claims that computers do or at least can (someday might) think. According to Searle's original presentation, the argument is based on two truths: brains cause minds , and syntax doesn't suffice for semantics . Its target, Searle dubs "strong AI": "according to strong AI," according to Searle, "the computer is not merely a tool in the study of the mind, rather the appropriately programmed computer really is a mind in the sense that computers given the right programs can be literally said to understand and have other cognitive states" (1980a, p. 417). Searle contrasts "strong AI" to "weak AI". According to weak AI, according to Searle, computers just simulate thought, their seeming understanding isn't real (just as-if) understanding, their seeming calculation as-if calculation, etc.; nevertheless, computer simulation is useful for studying the mind (as for studying the weather and other things).

18. Is The Brain A Digital Computer?
    searle, john R. (1980). Minds, Brains and Programs , The Behavioral and Brain Sciences.3, pp. 417424. searle, john R. (1984). Minds, Brains and Science.  
    http://cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Py104/searle.comp.html
    
    Extractions: John R. Searle Let us begin our investigation of this claim by distinquishing three questions: Is the brain a digital computer? Is the mind a computer program? Can the operations of the brain be simulated on a digital computer? I will be addressing 1 and not 2 or 3. I think 2 can be decisively answered in the negative. Since programs are defined purely formally or syntactically and since minds have an intrinsic mental content, it follows immediately that the program by itself cannot constitute the mind. The formal syntax of the program does not by itself guarantee the presence of mental contents. I showed this a decade ago in the Chinese Room Argument (Searle,1980). A computer, me for example, could run the steps in the program for some mental capacity, such as understanding Chinese, without understanding a word of Chinese. The argument rests on the simple logical truth that syntax is not the same as, nor is it by itself sufficient for, semantics. So the answer to the second question is obviously "No". One might think that this question would lose much of its interest if question 2 receives a negative answer. That is, one might suppose that unless the mind is a program, there is no interest to the question whether the brain is a computer. But that is not really the case. Even for those who agree that programs by themselves are not constitutive of mental phenomena, there is still an important question: Granted that there is more to the mind than the syntactical operations of the digital computer; nonetheless, it might be the case that mental states are

19. Conversation With John Searle, Cover Page
    Harry Kreisler interviews john R. searle, Mills Professor of Philosophy, UC Berkeley, on Philosophy and the Habits of Critical Thinking Our guest is john R. searle, who is Mills Professor of Philosophy at the University of California at Watch this interview in its entirety via webcast from UCTV 7796 searle  
    http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/people/Searle/searle-con0.html
    
    Extractions: Photo by Jane Scherr This interview is part of the Institute's "Conversations with History" series, and uses Internet technology to share with the public Berkeley's distinction as a global forum for ideas. I'm Harry Kreisler of the Institute of International Studies. Welcome to a Conversation with History. Our guest is John R. Searle, who is Mills Professor of Philosophy at the University of California at Berkeley. Among his ten books are Speech Acts, Expression and Meaning, Campus Wars, Intentionality, The Rediscovery of the Mind, The Construction of Social Reality, and Minds, Brains and Science, based on his acclaimed Reith Lectures. He has taught at Cal for forty years and his works have been translated into twenty languages. Background [jpeg + gif images ~24k] Philosophical Problems [jpeg images total ~29k] the brick wall ... transcending the mind-body dichotomy ... philosophy ends where science begins ... what is philosophy?

20. Generation5 - John Searle
    A short interview focusing on searle's views concerning artificial intelligence.  
    http://www.generation5.org/searle.shtml
    
    Extractions: Printable Version John Searle , Professor of Philosophy at Berkeley, is best known for his famous "Chinese Room" Analogy. The analogy goes like this: Dr. Searle is in a large room with two holes marked I (Input) and O (Output). From the 'I' box, he gets handed questions written in Chinese kanji . Also in his room is a huge book with English instructions as to how to look up the answers and write them on a piece of paper to the Chinese questions - therefore, practicalities aside, he could look up any question and give the right answer. Searle says this is analogous to computers running NLP programs — just because they input the correct answer given an input, no matter how complicated the algorithm, it does not constitute understanding The analogy has been a huge area of debate for the twenty years that has passed since Dr. Searle first published his paper on it. Generation5 is very proud to have had the chance to interview him.

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

1-20 of 99    1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20