61. Approved Courses Undergraduate Catalog University Of Maryland College Park math 430 Euclidean and NonEuclidean Geometries (3) Prerequisite math 141. Hilbert s axioms for Euclidean geometry. Neutral geometry http://www.inform.umd.edu/ugradcat/courses/MATH.html

Select Home University Background and General Information Admission Requirements and Application Procedures Fees, Expenses and Financial Aid Campus Administration, Resources and Student Services Registration, Academic Regulations and Requirements General Education Requirements The Colleges and Schools Departments and Campus-Wide Programs Approved Courses University of Maryland Administrators and Faculty Appendices Department Listings Chapter 8 Approved Courses MATH 001 Review of High School Algebra (3) Recommended for students who plan to take MATH 110 or MATH 002 but are not currently qualified to do so. Special fee required in addition to the regular tuition charge for fall and spring semesters. This course does not carry credit towards any degree at the University. Provides students with the foundation in intermediate algebra that is necessary for the study of the first college level math course, MATH 110. Topics include a review of the operations on real numbers, linear equations in one and two variables, systems of linear equations, linear inequalities, operations on polynomials, factoring, applications and solutions of quadratic equations. MATH 002 Advanced Review of High School Algebra (3) Recommended for students who plan to take but who are not currently qualified for MATH 115. Prerequisite: a satisfactory score on the mathematics placement exam or MATH 001 or MATH 001L. Special fee required in addition to the regular tuition charge for fall and spring semesters. This course does not carry credit towards any degree at the University. Review of high school algebra at a faster pace and at a more advanced level than MATH 001. Exponents; polynomials; linear equations in one and two variables; quadratic equations; and polynomial, rational, exponential and logarithmic functions.

62. New Foundations Home Page Holmes manages the list and should be contacted at holmes@math.boisestate.edu The axioms of New Foundations (hereinafter NF) are extensionality sets with the http://math.boisestate.edu/~holmes/holmes/nf.html

New Foundations home page Warning: Boise State University now calls its domain "boisestate" instead of "idbsu". It is advisable to change e-mail addresses for me and web addresses of any links to this or others of my pages to reflect this. Note: new notes on forcing in NFU and NF itself can be seen under my name in the NF fans list. For new information about the mailing list, look in the Mailing List and Links to NF Fans section. Contents Introduction Mailing List and Links to NF Fans Definition The Paradoxes ... Thomas Forster's Exhaustive Bibliography (new version set up in HTML by Paul West) Introduction This page is (permanently) under construction by Randall Holmes The subject of the home page which is developing here is the set theory "New Foundations", first introduced by W. V. O. Quine in 1937 . This is a refinement of Russell's theory of types based on the observation that the types in Russell's theory look the same, as far as one can apparently prove. To see Thomas Forster's master bibliography for the entire subject, as updated and HTML'ed by Paul West, click here . References in this page also refer to the master bibliography. We are very grateful to Thomas Forster for allowing us to use his bibliography. An all purpose reference for this field (best for NF) is

63. Mathematics Course Descriptions topological spaces, metric spaces, Cartesian products, connectedness, identification stopology, weak topologies, separation axioms. Prerequisite math451 or http://www.potsdam.edu/MATH/MathDeptHomePage/UndergradCourses.html

Mathematics Course Descriptions Undergraduate Courses Courses are offered each semester unless otherwise designated. MATH-100 Excursions in Mathematics (3) This is an introduction to mathematics as an exciting and creative discipline. Students will explore recent developments and mathematical ideas that have intrigued humanity for ages. This course does not satisfy the BA in Elementary Education mathematics concentration requirement. Prerequisite: two years of high school mathematics. MATH-101 Mathematics for Elementary Education I (3) Topics in foundations of mathematics include: problem solving strategies, abstract and symbolic representation, numeration and number systems, functions and use of variables. Satisfies one of the mathematics concentration requirements for the BA in Elementary Education. Not required for double majors in mathematics and elementary education. Prerequisite: three years of high school, Regents-level mathematics or permission. MATH-102 Mathematics for Elementary Education II (3) Topics in Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometry including: shapes in two or three dimensions, symmetries, transformations, tessellations, coordinate geometry, measurement. Satisfies one of the mathematics concentration requirements for the BA in Elementary Education. Not required for double majors in mathematics and elementary education.

64. David Hilbert Excerpt from math Odyssey 2000. In 1899 he published his little book The Foundations of Geometry , in which he stated a set of axioms that finally removed the http://www.sonoma.edu/Math/faculty/falbo/hilbert.html

David Hilbert (1862-1943) Excerpt from Math Odyssey 2000 David Hilbert was born in Koenigsberg, East Prussia in 1862 and received his doctorate from his home town university in 1885. His knowledge of mathematics was broad and he excelled in most areas. His early work was in a field called the theory of algebraic invariants. In this subject his contributions equaled that of Eduard Study, a mathematician who, according to Hilbert, "knows only one field of mathematics." Next after looking over the work done by French mathematicians, Hilbert concentrated on theories involving algebraic and transfinite numbers. In 1899 he published his little book The Foundations of Geometry , in which he stated a set of axioms that finally removed the flaws from Euclidean geometry. At the same time and independently, the American mathematician Robert L. Moore (who was then 19 years old) also published an equivalent set of axioms for Euclidean geometry. Some of the axioms in both systems were the same, but there was an interesting feature about those axioms that were different. Hilbert's axioms could be proved as theorems from Moore's and conversely, Moore's axioms could be proved as theorems from Hilbert's. After these successes with the axiomatization of geometry, Hilbert was inspired to try to develop a program to axiomatize all of mathematics. With his attempt to achieve this goal, he began what is known as the "formalist school" of mathematics. In the meantime, he was expanding his contributions to mathematics in several directions partial differential equations, calculus of variations and mathematical physics. It was clear to him that he could not do all this alone; so in 1900, when he was 38 years old, Hilbert gave a massive homework assignment to all the mathematicians of the world.

65. Math HOW-TOs & Leading Questions How to interpret axioms for numbers as rules for arithmetic which say when two different For a first answer see Volume 3, Why Slopes and More math, Chapters 1 http://whyslopes.com/freeAccess/HOW_TOs.html

Appetizers and Lessons for Mathematics and Reason by Alan Selby, email (version francais disponsible) Site Area: Xtra Lessons and Essays Site Entrance (books, posters, etc) Back Area Content Next ... Site Entrance msg=""; logged_in=0; Trois notions qui mènent à l'algèbre Logique basée sur des règles Deux définitions d'une variable HOW-TOs and Leading Questions Leading questions will become HOW-TOs as answers become available. Visit the webvideo section of this site for a growing number of audio-videos that will offer help on demand, as you need it, for learning or teaching key ideas in mathematics. FOR logic whole numbers and fractions arithmetic Leading Questions, algebra - words before symbols trigonometric - complex #s before or after. complex numbers geometry calculus real analysis The best source of information in a mathematics course should be a well-selected, precisely written textbook. Advice Advice For Students What to do in School and Why How to Study Math and Why How to Read How to Learn Advice For Teachers How to explain inductively What to try for in the classroom Advice For Parents: Helping with. science

66. Math 452/502 Course Page Fall 2003 320, Phone (256) 8242229, Email ais@email.uah.edu, Webpage www.math.uah.edu 11 Ordered fields (11 axioms for fields and 4 order axioms for fields, Theorem http://ultra.math.uah.edu/~ai/Math502/math502.html

Math 452/502 Fall 2003 (08/25/03 - 12/11/03) Introduciton to Real Analysis Course Information: Instructor: Shangbing Ai, MDH 320, Phone: (256) 824-2229, Email: ais@email.uah.edu, Webpage: www.math.uah.edu/ai Class meetings: TR 5:30-6:50 pm, MDH 329 Office Hours: TR 3:30-5:00 pm or by appointment Prerequities: MA 330 and MA 442 , or approval of instructor. This course is taught as MA 452/502. Textbook: Analysis with an Introduction to Proof, 3rd Edition, by Steven R. Lay. Grading: Homework (30%), two in class tests (20%+20%), the final (30%). Test Dates: Test 1 (Thursday, 10/9), Test 2 (Thursday, 11/13), Final (12/11, 6:30 - 9:00 pm). Course Objectives: Sequences, limits, continuity, differentiation of functions of one real variable, Riemann integration, uniform convergence, sequences and series of functions, power series, and Taylor series. Main Topics and Schedule (tentative) Chapter 3. The Real Numbers Sec. 10: Natural numbers and induction (well-ordering property of N (Axiom 10.1), Principle of mathematical induction (Theormem 10.2), exmaple 10.3) Exercises (P.92): 10.4, 10.14

67. Cvs Commit: Proj/darwinports/dports/math/acl2/files Patch-axioms.lisp cvs commit proj/darwinports/dports/math/acl2/files patchaxioms.lisp. Gregory Wright gwright at opendarwin.org Mon Mar 15 065457 PST 2004 http://www.opendarwin.org/pipermail/cvs-darwinports-all/2004-March/024312.html

cvs commit: proj/darwinports/dports/math/acl2/files patch-axioms.lisp Gregory Wright gwright at opendarwin.org Mon Mar 15 06:54:57 PST 2004 Previous message: cvs commit: proj/darwinports/dports/sysutils/mc Portfile Next message: cvs commit: proj/darwinports/dports/devel/subversion Portfile Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Previous message: cvs commit: proj/darwinports/dports/sysutils/mc Portfile Next message: cvs commit: proj/darwinports/dports/devel/subversion Portfile Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] ... More information about the Cvs-darwinports-all mailing list

68. The Joel On Software Forum - Coding Is Math? apriory axioms fundamental buildings blocks of monastaries? I find this math superiority complex amusing in software developers. http://discuss.fogcreek.com/joelonsoftware/default.asp?cmd=show&ixPost=139686

69. DCFTITLE - Viewing Message in math . Author Info, Member since Apr 23rd 2004 57 posts. Date, Thu Apr29-04 0557 AM. Message, In response to In response to 3. is dependent on the axioms http://new.carmforums.org/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=150&topic_id=2027&me

70. Math 223Q problems ask you to think about definitions or to use the axioms of geometry on fairly formal proofs, this course is probably unlike any other math course you http://www.math.uconn.edu/~solomon/math223.html

Math 223Q Section 2 Spring 2004 Reed Solomon 214 MSB solomon@math.uconn.edu Office Hours My official offices are on Mondays from 2-3 and on Tuesdays from 2-3:30. However, I am around the math building quite a bit and I am happy to make appointments to meet with you at times other than my office hours. Feel free to stop by my office and bang on the door if you are in the building and have a question. If you don't catch me that way, send me email at the address above and suggest a meeting time. Homework Assignments The final exam is on May 7 from 6 to 8 in the evening in CLAS 102. The final is cumulative and more information will be posted later when we get closer to the actual date. Assignment 9. (Due Weds 4/28) Chapter 5: #2 (you may assume without proof that the point E from the hint is interior to angle ACD), #3, #4. Note that these problems must be proved in neutral geometry, without the use of any parallel postulate! Chapter 6: #1, #2. Note that these problems are proved in hyperbolic geometry! Assignment 8. (Due Weds 4/21)

71. Siegfried/In Search Of A Formula program would halt. So there s no way to capture all mathematical truth in one system of axioms. math cannot be caged. It has to http://www.cs.umaine.edu/~chaitin/siegfried2.html

The Dallas Morning News, Monday, April 5, 2004 DISCOVERIES Dashing a dream Mathematicians used to dream that all truth could be deduced from a system of simple propositions, or axioms. But discoveries of the past century have shown that truth is more elusive, and math contains randomness that no system of axioms can explain. Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, inventor of the binary (0 and 1) system of numbers, observes that simple laws can describe regularities underlying the complexity of the world, but random information requires a lengthier description. David Hilbert proposes the idea of a system of axioms that could generate all the theorems of mathematics and check to see that they were correct. shows that any system of mathematical axioms will be unable to prove some true statements about the math, and will therefore be incomplete. Hilbert's dream was therefore shown to be impossible. Alan Turing proves that there is no way to compute ahead of time whether a computer program given no commands from the outside will ever stop running. Thus answers to some questions are uncomputable, a further demonstration of the hopelessness of Hilbert's dream. Gregory Chaitin proposes length of a computer program as a measure of randomness (or measure of intrinsic complexity of the program), rediscovering the insight of Leibniz.

72. Simple Proof, Just Using The Axioms - Physics Help And Math Help - Physics Forum use to prove this are the 5 basic mathematical axioms which allow http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=13071

73. Hardy's Axioms - Physics Help And Math Help - Physics Forums In the statement, axiom 5 states that there exists a continuous http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=6063

74. Math 420 - Real Analysis Fall 2000 math 420 Real Analysis Fall 2000. As a starting point in this study we will look into the structure of real line and explore some of the axioms of the real http://www.viterbo.edu/personalpages/faculty/MLukic/fall2000/math420/syllabus/sy

Next: Bibliography Math 420 - Real Analysis Fall 2000 MTWF 10:00am - 10:50am MC 415 Instructor: Dr. Milan Lukic Office: MC 521 Office Hours: MTWF 12:10 - 1:00 Phone: (608) 796-3659 (Office); 787-5464 (Home) e-mail: mnlukic@viterbo.edu WWW: http://www.viterbo.edu/personalpages/faculty/MLukic/ Course Description (from the catalog) Study of selected topics from real variable theory such as: real numbers; topology of the real line; metric spaces; Euclidean spaces; continuity; differentiation; the Riemann-Stieltjes integral; series. Prerequisite: grades of C or higher in 260 and 320. Text Elementary Real and Complex Analysis by Georgi E. Shilov, Dover Publications, Inc, New York 1973. Suplementary Reading Victor Bryant, Yet Another Introduction to Analysis , Cambridge University Press, 1996. The Content Analysis is about the concepts of function derivative and integral (quoted from the preface for the Shilov's book). As a starting point in this study we will look into the structure of real line and explore some of the axioms of the real number system The primary focus in the initial part of the course will be on the Completeness Axiom and various equivalent forms of it.

75. Re: Madden, Explain Math's Flaw Please In Reply to Re Madden, explain math s flaw please posted by MaddenL3 on December but equivalent formulations of the same theory, the number of axioms is not http://superstringtheory.com/forum/topboard/messages4/57.html

String Theory Discussion Forum String Theory Home Forum Index Re: Madden, explain math's flaw please Follow Ups Post Followup Topology IV FAQ Posted by DickT on December 25, 2002 at 10:39:02: In Reply to: Re: Madden, explain math's flaw please posted by on December 24, 2002 at 18:31:27: Lee, The general rule on axiom systems is the same as Einstein's "Everything must be made as simple as possible, but no simpler". Of course if any axiom in a set is a consequence of any of the others, it should be dropped. That is, the axiom must be independent, or in another terminology "a minimal spanning set". In different but equivalent formulations of the same theory, the number of axioms is not invariant; one formulation may require fewer axioms than another. In such a case it might be tempting to just adopt the formulation with the fewer axioms, but this might be unwise. It may be that the other formulation gives you a better angle on new discoveries. In any case, removing an axiom that has independent content (such as existence of irrationals) is not justifiable simply on grounds of parsimony, The set of axioms should be minimal, but it should also span. Peace to you on Christmas Day

76. Winfried Just's Professional Interests These rules can be reduced to a few particularly simple ones that are called the axioms of set theory. These axiom act as a grand http://www.math.ohiou.edu/~just/resint.html

My professional interests Whatever interests, is interesting. William Hazlitt My original area of expertise was set theory , especially the forcing method and combinatorial principles Currently, I work on applications of mathematics to biology, in particular, on game-theoretic models of animal interactions and on the multiple alignment problem which is of crucial importance in the new science of bioinformatics I love expository writing and teaching To my great surprise, I found out during my sabbatical in 1997/98 that I like computer programming It is often said that set theory is the foundation of modern mathematics. The meaning of this somewhat pompous phrase is that all the structures studied in various branches of mathematics can be interpreted as sets, and hence all mathematical theorems can, at least in principle, be derived from the rules governing the formation of sets. These rules can be reduced to a few particularly simple ones that are called the axioms of set theory. These axiom act as a grand unifying principle for all of mathematics: A mathematical statement is a theorem if and only if it ultimately follows from the axioms of set theory. This is the case regardless of whether the statement is about algebraic structures, differential equations, or probability distributions. The method for establishing that a mathematical statement is indeed a theorem is to give a

77. Pambuccian.htm Pambuccian, Victor Congruence axioms for absolute geometry. math. Chronicle 14 (1985), 4748. Pambuccian, Victor A simple proof of a metrization theorem. http://www.west.asu.edu/iasweb/faculty/pambuc.HTM

Faculty Integrative Studies Photo Courtesy of Digital VIsion Education : Ph.D. Univeristy of Michigan, Mathematics Office: FAB N272 Phone: Email: victor.pambuccian@asu.edu Courses Taught : History of the Philosophy of Math, Mathematical Structures, Introduction to Geometry, Geometry for Teachers, Abstract Algebra, Theory of Numbers. Victor V. Pambuccian receaved a Baccalaureat from German Lyceum (Rumania); a M.S. from the University of Bucharest (Rumania); and a Ph.D. from the University of Michigan. He is an assistant professor of Mathematics in the Department of Integrative Studies. Courses Taught: History and Philosophy of Mathematics (MAT 411) This course examines the nature of mathematics from origin to the present, revealed by its history and philosophy. Strong background in mathematics is not required. Geometry for Teachers I ntroduction to Geometry (MAT 310) This course covers congruence, area, parallelism, similarity and volume, and Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometry. Prerequisite: MAT272 or equivalent. Geometry for Teachers is a special topic offered for teachers.

78. Leibniz, Information, Math And Physics And from this new informationtheoretic point of view, math and physics are respectively compressed into concise physical laws or mathematical axioms, both of http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/CDMTCS/chaitin/kirchberg.html

Leibniz, Information, Math and Physics Reported in the Dallas Morning News! G. J. Chaitin, IBM Research Division, P. O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA, E-mail: chaitin@us.ibm.com Abstract: The information-theoretic point of view proposed by Leibniz in 1686 and developed by algorithmic information theory (AIT) suggests that mathematics and physics are not that different. This will be a first-person account of some doubts and speculations about the nature of mathematics that I have entertained for the past three decades, and which have now been incorporated in a digital philosophy paradigm shift that is sweeping across the sciences. 1. What is algorithmic information theory? The starting point for my own work on AIT forty years ago was the insight that a scientific theory is a computer program that calculates the observations, and that the smaller the program is, the better the theory. If there is no theory, that is to say, no program substantially smaller than the data itself, considering them both to be finite binary strings, then the observations are algorithmically random, theory-less, unstructured, incomprehensible and irreducible. Computer And from this new information-theoretic point of view, math and physics do not seem too different. In both cases understanding is compression, and is measured by the extent to which empirical data and mathematical theorems are respectively compressed into concise physical laws or mathematical axioms, both of which are embodied in computer software [5].

79. MATH FOR THE ENVIRONMENT COURSE ABSTRACT one end of the spectrum have been students very ``bad at math who were These patterns are called axioms (or ``laws ), and different people can come up with http://www.colorado.edu/math/earthmath/abstract.html

MATHEMATICS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT The Why? Who? and What? of this Course I created this class a few years ago to fill a void. As a part of my job, for many years I have taught algebra, trigonometry, calculus and assorted other ``introductory'' (or ``terminal'') mathematics classes. A few of my beginning students have been extremely mathematically gifted, a few have not shown up for class even when they were sitting in front of me. I fear many students have graduated from college without a deep understanding or technical command of humble subjects such as fractions. Far too many students have expressed math anxiety and a fear of failing, based on negative experiences in high school, elementary school, kindergarten and beyond. Most students see little connection between their math class and life as they intend to live it. Of course, math is required, math builds character or at least tolerance for adversity. Which brings me to why. Why did I write this book? It is quite clear to me (and at least a few others) that today's civilization/economy is like a jet a technological marvel, apparently defying the law of gravity, until the fuel tanks hit empty. We clever humans have designed a way of living that apparently violates many laws of Nature, until an irreplaceable resource runs out or there is a design failure that exposes false assumptions. If at least a few understand this human predicament, then an unpleasant crash might be avoided; or at least the seeds of our successors can parachute to safety.

80. MATH 360: Foundations Of Geometry of the Parallel Postulate or why the parallel postulate cannot be derived from the other axioms of Euclidean Great for those interested in math education. http://people.hws.edu/mitchell/math360f02.html

Math 360: Foundations of Geometry Offered: Fall 2002 Instructor: Kevin J. Mitchell Office: Lansing 305 Phone: (315)781-3619 Fax: (315)781-3860 E-mail: mitchell@hws.edu Information Available: About the course Outline of Weekly Readings Assessment Office Hours ... Additional Sources on Reserve About the Course This course is about geometry and, in particular, the discovery (creation) of non-Euclidean geometry about 200 years ago. At the same time, the course serves as an example of how the discipline of mathematics works, illuminating the roles of axioms, definitions, logic, and proof. In this sense, the course is about the process of doing mathematics. The course provides a rare opportunity to see how and why mathematicians struggled with key ideas-sometimes getting things wrong, other times having great insights (though occasionally they did not recognize this fact). History is important to this subject; this course should convince you that mathematics is a very human endeavor. The course focuses on Euclid's Parallel Axiom: "For any line l and any point P not on l, there is a unique line through P parallel to l." In particular, could this axiom be deduced as a consequence of the earlier and more intuitive axioms that Euclid had laid out for his geometry? Mathematicians struggled with this question for 2000 years before successfully answering it. The answer had a profound philosophical effect on all later mathematics, as we will see.

Page 4     61-80 of 90    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20