41. Alaska Supreme Court Cases judge recusal based on adverse rulings) federal Issues (fed preempts state law on airlines routes, prices use public policy when interpreting statutes) Treacy v http://touchngo.com/sp/sp.htm

Alaska Supreme Court Opinions Subject index to Alaska Supreme Court Opinions Word Search the Alaska Supreme Court Opinions 1991-2004 Alaska Supreme Court Opinions Alaska Appellate Courts' ... Case Management System Recent Alaska Supreme Court Opinions (From 4/4/04) Stanley B. v. State, DFYS (06/04/2004) sp-5811 Family Law ] (incarceration as grounds for CINA/termination) Ledgends, Inc. v. Kerr (05/28/2004) sp-5810 Torts ] (limitations of pre-recreational exculpatory release) Hallam v. Alaska Airlines, Inc. (05/21/2004) sp-5809 Attorneys and Judges ] (no trial judge recusal based on adverse rulings) Federal Issues ] (fed. preempts state law on airlines routes, prices) Procedure, Appellate ] (Rule 56(f), discretionary with trial judge) Procedure, Appellate ] (deference to trial judge on witness credibility; weight of conflicting evidence) Alaskans for Efficient Government, Inc. v. Knowles (05/14/2004) sp-5808 Real Estate ] (also use public policy when interpreting statutes) Treacy v. Municipality of Anchorage (05/14/2004) sp-5807 Constitutional ] (municipal ordinance presumed constitutional) Municipal Corporations ] (ordinances presumed constitutional) Procedure, Appellate

42. ROE V. WADE in the past for violating the State s abortion laws, he makes state criminal case cannot affirmatively challenge in federal court the statutes under which http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Roe/

ROE v. WADE Decided January 22, 1973 MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN delivered the opinion of the Court MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST , dissenting. MR. JUSTICE STEWART , concurring. 2. Roe has standing to sue; the Does and Hallford do not. Pp. 123-129. (a) Contrary to appellee's contention, the natural termination of Roe's pregnancy did not moot her suit. Litigation involving pregnancy, which is "capable of repetition, yet evading review," is an exception to the usual federal rule that an actual controversy must exist at review stages and not simply when the action is initiated. Pp. 124-125. (b) The District Court correctly refused injunctive, but erred in granting declaratory, relief to Hallford, who alleged no federally protected right not assertable as a defense against the good-faith state prosecutions pending against him. Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66. Pp. 125-127. (c) The Does' complaint, based as it is on contingencies, any one or more of which may not occur, is too speculative to present an actual case or controversy. Pp. 127-129. 3. State criminal abortion laws, like those involved here, that except from criminality only a life-saving procedure on the mother's behalf without regard to the stage of her pregnancy and other interests involved violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which protects against state action the right to privacy, including a woman's qualified right to terminate her pregnancy. Though the State cannot override that right, it has legitimate interests in protecting both the pregnant woman's health and the potentiality of human life, each of which interests grows and reaches a "compelling" point at various stages of the woman's approach to term. Pp. 147-164.

43. Washingtonpost.com: Supreme Court Overturns Religious Freedom Statute supreme court Overturns Religious Freedom Statute Congress s authority to pass laws safeguarding constitutional rights wrote, finding that federal lawmakers in http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/supcourt/stories/062697a.

Supreme Court Report Supreme Court Overturns Religious Freedom Statute By Joan Biskupic Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, June 26, 1997; Page A01 The Supreme Court yesterday struck down a federal law intended to protect religious practices from government interference. By a 6 to 3 vote, the justices said Congress had usurped the court's power to define constitutional protection of religion and intruded on the business of the states. The majority questioned whether the 1993 law was even necessary to counteract religious bigotry. But in fierce dissent, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor took the extraordinary step of reading her objections from the bench, declaring that America's religious liberty has been harmed by the majority's ruling. The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, passed with broad bipartisan support and the enthusiastic backing of President Clinton as well as church groups across the spectrum, said governments can infringe on religious practices only if they have a health, safety or other "compelling interest" in doing so. It originally was adopted to address complaints by religious groups that some general state and local laws discriminated against practitioners. Since its passage, the law has been invoked in a broad range of bitter, emotional disputes. It has been used as a legal tool to keep church-run soup kitchens open, to allow prisoners to wear religious jewelry and to protect the Amish from being required to put bright orange warning signs on their buggies.

44. National Arbitration Forum and does not conflict with the controlling federal law. are replacing their current statute with the the 1990 United States supreme court decisions may well be http://www.arb-forum.com/articles/html/ADRPro-jud--11-02.asp

What laws govern arbitration? A variety of federal and some state laws regulate arbitrations. The two most common sources of governing law are the Federal Arbitration Act and federal court decisions. These two controlling sources govern all arbitrations involving interstate commerce, which includes virtually all arbitrations. Some aspects of applicable state law may also govern the validity and enforcement of the arbitration process and awards. Federal court judges must apply the federal laws and applicable state law in federal court cases involving arbitrations. State court judges must apply federal laws in state court cases involving interstate commerce arbitrations and any applicable state law. What have court decisions held regarding arbitration laws? There are many federal Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals decisions regarding arbitrations. These numerous holdings are to be followed by state and federal judges in reviewing arbitration cases. These opinions have commonly held: 1. Parties may agree to arbitration in a pre-dispute or a post dispute agreement.

45. Fondren Library: with annotations to case law and other materials related to the statutes. Case Law federal case law includes court decisions from federal district courts http://www.rice.edu/fondren/gov/sportslaw.html

Sports Law Resources (http://www.rice.edu/fondren/gov/sportslaw.html) Primary Sources Primary sources contain the authoritative "letter of the law". They include statutes, regulations, and court decisions. Use either Westlaw Campus or Academic Universe to access these resources. Note: The library also has paper versions of U.S. and Texas statutes, regulations, and case law. Search ex: Using Westlaw Campus you can narrow your search to the topic "Art, Entertainment, and Sports Law" by using "Key Search", the last option on the main Westlaw Campus search page. Federal Law Statutes Federal statutes are laws passed by the United States Congress. The official publication of the statutes is called the United States Code (USC). In our online databases you will see references to two value added publications of the federal statutes. Westlaw Campus cites USCA and Academic Universe cites USCS. Both publications contain the full text of the USC together with annotations to case law and other materials related to the statutes. Search ex: Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961, 15 U.S.C. § 1291 (antitrust exemption)

46. Court Decisions of particular provisions of state or federal law or that random violent offender; the statute regulates conduct review granted by California supreme court on Mar http://www.cahro.org/html/court_decisions.html

Hate Crimes Hate Crime Definition Legislation Court Decisions ... back to top Important California Cases Interpreting California Hate Crime Statutes California Supreme Court cases In re M. S (1995) 10 Gal. 4th 698 ( California Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of California's hate crime statutes, rejecting defense claims that the laws are over broad, vague, or impermissible content-based regulation of speech; the court also ruled that when a defendant has multiple motives for committing a crime, the kind of bias prohibited by the hate crime law must be a substantial factor in bringing about the crime before the crime will be considered a hate crime.) People v. Superior (Aishman (1995) 10 Gal. 4th 735 (Penal Code section 422.75, which provides for imposition of a sentence enhancement for felonies committed because of the victim's actual or perceived race, color, nationality, country or origin, ancestry, disability or sexual orientation, does not need to be read to include a specific intent requirement; this section will also be interpreted to require that when multiple concurrent causes for the offense exist, if the bias motivation is a substantial factor in bringing about the offense, the perpetrator's sentence can be enhanced.) California Court of Appeal Cases Coon v.

47. AMNews: March 24/31, 2003. Supreme Court Strikes Down Use Of RICO Statute Agains court strikes down use of RICO statute against anti can t be held accountable under federal antiracketeering and anti-extortion laws may look bad http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2003/03/24/gvsb0324.htm

@import url(/amednews/site/amnbasic.css); @import url(/amednews/site/amnprint.css) print; American Medical News LISTINGS Latest issue '03 by date '03 by region Map ... Search SERVICES Mobile edition E-mail alert RSS Subscribe! ... Send feedback ADVERTISEMENT Supreme Court strikes down use of RICO statute against anti-abortion protestors The decision is unlikely to revive the types of abortion clinic violence and disruptions that occurred in the 1980s and 1990s. By Tanya Albert AMNews staff. March 24/31, 2003. At first glance, a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that says abortion protesters can't be held accountable under federal anti-racketeering and anti-extortion laws may look bad for physicians and their patients, but a closer look shows there's no reason to worry. Nearly two decades after a legal fight started over bombings, blockades and other disruptive tactics used by anti-abortion protesters in the 1980s and 1990s, the high court in February ruled 8-1 that protesters cannot be held accountable under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly known as RICO, or under the Hobbs Act, a federal anti-extortion statute. With this article Case at a glance Links See related content The National Organization for Women and other groups had argued that Joseph Scheidler and his Pro-Life Action League, and other anti-abortion groups, crossed the line protecting free speech and should be subject to the federal laws usually aimed at organized crime activities. (The AMA and other medical groups filed a friend-of-the-court brief saying physicians and others in clinics should have legal protection from disruptions and injuries from protests that turn into criminal conduct.)

48. Federal Law And Legislation : Maine State Law And Legislative Reference Library Q A in Legislative Research (Law Librarians Society Finder (Emory) Links to federal court cases from FLITE supreme court decisions, 1937-1975 - Forms for http://www.state.me.us/legis/lawlib/fedlaw.htm

Homepage iResearch Collections s Services Research Aids Catalog Ask a Librarian ... Constitution Bills A Bill Becomes a Law in the US Process outline from introduction of a bill in Congress through its interpretation in the federal court system with print sources and Internet links. Bill Summary and Status (Thomas) Searchable and browseable databases of legislative records about federal bills from the 93rd Congress (1973) forward. Enactment of a Law Senate procedures described by the Parliamentarian of the Senate. Congressional Bills GPO Access Search form for all published versions of bills from the 103rd Congress (1991) forward. History of Bills (GPO Access) Section of the Congressional Record Index that provides information about all bills and resolves introduced. How Our Laws Are Made House procedures revised and updated by the Parliamentarian of the House. Thomas - Search form for keywords or bill numbers and links for browsing bills from the 101st Congress (1987) forward. Session laws Public and Private Laws (GPO Access) - Links to catalogs of laws and a search form for laws from the 104th Congress (1995) forward.

49. FindLaw: Cases And Codes: Supreme Court Opinions WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW Connect with Westlaw cases and statutes$12 LawQuote Need http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/supreme.html

FindLaw Legal Professionals Students Business ... Lawyer Search State AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AS GU MP PR VI Select a Practice Area Administrative Law Adoption Agriculture Law Alternative Dispute Resolution Animal Bites Asbestos Mesothelioma Aviation Bankruptcy Law Business Organizations Child Support Civil Rights Constitutional Law Construction Law Consumer Protection Contracts Criminal Law Criminal Law Federal Debtor/Creditor Discrimination Divorce DUI/DWI Education Law Elder Law Eminent Domain Employment Law Employee Employment Law Employer Energy Law Environmental Law Estate Planning Family Law Franchising Gaming Law Government Contracts Insurance Law Intellectual Property Law International Law Internet Cyberspace Labor Law Landlord/Tenant Legal Malpractice Lemon Law Medical Malpractice Military Law Motor Vehicle Accidents Motor Vehicle Defects Native Peoples Law Natural Resources Law Nursing Home Patents Personal Injury Defense Personal Injury Premises Liability Products Liability Law Professional Malpractice Law Real Estate Law Securities Law Sexual Harassment Social Security Disability Taxation Law Toxic Substances Trademarks Traffic Violations Transportation Law Trusts Wills Workers' Compensation Law Wrongful Death Document Library Legal Dictionary Legal News FindLaw Legal Web Sites All Web Sites US Government Sites US Supreme Court All Circuit Courts US Constitution FindLaw Newsletters Top Legal News Headlines Legal Grounds More Newsletters MY Find Law Email Password: Keep me logged in until I sign out.

50. Ben's Guide (9-12): Branches Of Government -- Judicial Branch -- The Supreme Cou of the US Constitution and its jurisdiction is set out by statute in Title review and enables the court to invalidate both federal and state laws when they http://bensguide.gpo.gov/9-12/government/national/scourt.html

The Supreme Court The Constitution established the Supreme Court as the highest court in the United States. The authority of the Court originates from Article III of the U.S. Constitution and its jurisdiction is set out by statute in Title 28 of the U.S. Code One of the Supreme Court’s most important responsibilities is to decide cases that raise questions of constitutional interpretation. The Court decides if a law or government action violates the Constitution. This is known as judicial review and enables the Court to invalidate both federal and state laws when they conflict with the Constitution. Since the Supreme Court stands as the ultimate authority in constitutional interpretation, its decisions can be changed only by another Supreme Court decision or by a constitutional amendment. Judicial review puts the Supreme Court in a pivotal role in the American political system, making it the referee in disputes among various branches of the Federal, as well as state governments, and as the ultimate authority for many of the most important issues in the country. For example, in 1954, the Court banned racial segregation in public schools in Brown v.

51. WisBar: Legal Resources Wisconsin. Administrative Code Acts statutes State Constitution. US Code Code of federal Regulations federal Register Public laws Index US Constitution. http://www.wisbar.org/legalres/

Search WisBar Address change Lawyer search Free WI case law ... Sources of Legal Information for the Wisconsin Attorney UW Law Library State and Federal Legal Resources Wisconsin Court Decisions Administrative Decisions Supreme Court Case Law Court of Appeals Case Law Attorney General Opinions Dept. of Administration, ... Ethics Board Decisions LIRC: Unemp. Ins. Decisions Worker's Comp. Decisions Equal Rights Decisions Personnel Commission ... Wis. Tax Appeals Decisions Wisconsin Court Resources Supreme Court Table of pending cases Supreme Court Rules Case Status (WSCCA.i) CaseLaw Express Free weekly email case digest Board of Bar Examiners Search for approved CLE courses Office of Lawyer Regulation Wisconsin Briefs University of Wisconsin Law Library Court of Appeals Case Status (WSCCA.i)

52. Touro Law Center Presents: Project P.A.T.C.H. supreme court. Cases (Summary) Marbury v. Madison. Citation 5 U.S. 137 (1803)Concepts Judicial v. Executive Power/Judicial Review. Facts case is the courts first elaborate statement federal http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/CaseSummary.html

Touro Law Center proudly presents: Project P.A.T.C.H. Participatory Awareness Through Community Help Presented by Touro Law Center Sponsored by New York State Bar Association P.A.T.C.H. Conference Board Touro Law Center Introduction How to write a Brief Chart of Cases ... Acknowledgments and Credits Evaluation Answers Glossary of Terms

53. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATUTES Pennsylvania statutes are available on the web through several include CASECLERK, LOISLAW and VERSUS LAW. Selected federal and state court opinions can be http://members.aol.com/StatutesPA/Index.html

PENNSYLVANIA CONSOLIDATED STATUTES UNCONSOLIDATED PENNSYLVANIA STATUTES A website written and maintained by Thomas E. Martin, Jr., Esq. This page links laws of Pennsylvania enacted by the legislature, both the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes and unconsolidated statutes, arranged according to their customary citation. If the statute you want is not yet listed here, it should be available in the future, so check back. For information on Statutory Citation in Pennsylvania, click here! For six years this website has made available, free of charge, legal information which we believe is valuable to a wide variety of users and is nowhere else available on the web. Every month over 10,000 people use it. However, the work is not funded by any government subsidy. Therefore, requests for printed copies of these statutes or for ones not yet posted here cannot be filled. Similarly, we cannot provide free legal research services or provide free legal opinions. We do not have time to answer and will not respond to emails seeking these. Thank you for understanding. A word of caution is in order: The laws of each state are different. The following Pennsylvania statutes, though available instantaneously over the web, may not be the current law. We attempt to post statutes which, at the time of posting, have not been repealed, the date of posting usually being referenced at the bottom of each page. However, court decisions overturning them, later statutes amending them, and a host of other factors come into play when interpreting them. They are provided here only as one resource among many available and should not be relied upon by anyone in matters of importance.

54. Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Jurisdiction, federal field. NIERMAN, et al. Limitations, Statute of. Constitutional Law, Freedom of religion, Freedom of association. http://www.malawyersweekly.com/sjc.cfm

55. Laws And Legalities Of Slavery And Freedom In The US courts, which had been circumventing the federal Fugitive Law of Rights Act of 1964. United States statutes at Large Containing the laws and Concurrent http://johnbrownsbody.net/Statutes.htm

U. S. STATUTES, SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, AND MISCELLANEOUS DOCTRINES AND RESOLUTIONS BY DATE February 12, 1793 "Chapter VII: An Act respecting Fugitives from Justice, and Persons escaping from the Service of their Masters." Laws of the United States of America , vol. 2. Philadelphia: Richard Folwell, 1796, 165 et seq. Provided for the return of fugitive slaves. August, 1802 "Selectmen of Windsor against Stephen Jacob, Esquire, Windsor County, August Term, A. D. 1802." Tyler, Royall. Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of the State of Vermont Commencing with the Nineteenth Century , vol. 2. New York: I. Riley, 1810. Townspeople of Windsor, Vermont, sued Stephen Jacob, a judge on the Supreme Court of Vermont, for the support of a slave formerly owned by him. Jacob’s fellow judges ruled that, since Vermont did not recognize the institution of slavery, a bill of sale for a slave was not proof of ownership. This set a dangerous precedent in future cases concerning fugitive slaves. Theophilus Herrinton completed this precedent during the trial of a runaway slave by declaring that bills of sale for slaves from other states were also not proof of ownership. When asked what he would accept as proof, Herrinton replied that nothing less than a "bill of sale from the Almighty" would convince him that anyone had the right to own a slave. There is no surviving record of the Herrinton case, but we do know it was tried in Middlebury, Vermont, some time during his term as a state supreme court justice in 1813.

56. Legal Links federal Judiciary Home Page. federal Judicial Center. State Legislative Sites. State Constitutions, statutes Session laws. statutes Session laws. http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/legalinks.htm

top Law Related Web Sites You are now leaving the web page of the United States District Court, District of Minnesota. The hypertext links below contain information created and maintained by other public and private organizations. These links and pointers are provided for the user's convenience. The District of Minnesota does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this outside information. Further, the inclusion of links to particular items in hypertext is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse any views expressed, or products or services offered, on these outside sites, or the organizations sponsoring the sites. Associations Legal and Law Related Journals General Reference Legal Information ... Libraries Associations Federal Bar Association Federal Magistrate Judges Association Federal Communications Bar Association National Bar Association ... top General References Library Spot - Links to major references works and online libraries Corporate Information - over 300,000 profiles of publicly-traded and privately-held companies worldwide.

57. ABA Public Education Supreme Court Preview December 2000 Cases At case as untimely under the California statute of limitations. case was dismissed “on the merits.” Under federal Rule of is a matter of state law, and under http://www.abanet.org/publiced/preview/glances/dec_00.html

You currently do not have JavaScript enabled in your web browser. The ABA website relies on JavaScript for display purposes. To fully experience the ABA site, please enable javascript. Cases at a Glance Cases Argued December 2000 Monday, November 27 VOTING RIGHTS Was race the "predominant" factor in North Carolina's redistricting plan? Hunt v. Cromartie and Smallwood v. Cromartie Docket Nos. 99-1864 and 99-1865 From: The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Case at a Glance In a series of (often 5-4) decisions, the Supreme Court has ruled that creating legislative districts with the express purpose of ensuring minority dominance goes beyond the beneficial purposes of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and violates the Fourteenth Amendment. Now, for the fourth time in eight years, the Court will examine the constitutionality of District 12 in North Carolina. Previewed by David L. Hudson Jr., a staff attorney with the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn., and a contributor to the ABA Journal Supreme Court Decision: Click to read decision CRIMINAL PROCEDURE What constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing?

58. Famous & Historic Court Decisions From The 'Lectric Law Library Congress has No Power to Enact a Statute which Limits the Jurisdiction of the federal Courts, 49k; WO v. HOPKINS, 1886 A Neutral Law Violates Equal http://www.lectlaw.com/tcas.htm

The 'Lectric Law Library Lawcopedia's HISTORIC COURT DECISIONS Topic Area Here's A Selection of Famous, Infamous, and Historically Significant Constitutional Court Decisions Mostly by the U.S. Supremes, generally in chronological order, the larger ones are available "One puts on black robes to scare the hell out of white people, while the other puts on white robes to scare the hell out of blacks." Morris Udall, comparing the Supreme Court & KKK MARBURY v. MADISON, 1803 Established the "Very Essence of Judicial Duty" is Deciding what Laws Conform to the Constitution ("Judicial Review"), 64k M'CULLOCH v. MARYLAND, 1819 U.S. Constitution is "The Supreme Law of the Land", 201k M'CULLOCH v. MARYLAND, 65k, Zip GIBBONS v. OGDEN, 1821 the Constitution Defines Federal Power to Regulate Commerce THE APOLLON, EDON, CLAIM, 1824 Holding the Municipal Laws of One Nation Do Not Extend Beyond its Own Territory, Except Regarding Its Own Citizens, 29k DRED SCOTT v. SANDFORD, 1857 Infamous Decision That a Slave's Not a "Citizen" but "Property, to be Used in Subserviency to the Interests, the Convenience, or the

59. Rutgers-Newark Law Library, Internet Law Guide: United States Federal Law US federal statutes Legislative Information. federal Sentencing Guidelines; Thomas Congressional bills, Public laws, Congressional Record from 101st http://law-library.rutgers.edu/ilg/usfedlaw.html

Rutgers-Newark Law Library HOME Internet Law Guide HOME United States Federal Law by Paul Axel-Lute last revised March 16, 2004 Contents Constitution Regulations Presidential Documents Court Rules ... Administrative Decisions (See also the FedLaw U.S. Federal Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution (at Thomas) at GPO Access and at Findlaw . This work, prepared by the Congressional Research Service, provides extensive annotations to the Constitution, with references to U.S. Supreme Court cases. The Findlaw version merges the 1996 and 1998 supplements with the 1992 edition text, and gives links from the case citations to the full opinions, but omits some prefatory and appended material found in the full original version at GPO Access, such as texts of proposed but unratified amendments, lists of federal and state acts held unconstitutional, and a list of overruled Supreme Court decisions. The Founders' Constitution (at Univ. of Chicago Press) A major collection of the writings of the Founders, arranged under the relevant clauses of the Constitution. Declaration of Independence United States Code United States Code (Cornell) (To check for changes to a U.S.C. section found at either site, check the

60. Laws, Regulations & Cases federal lawscurrent edition only); statutes at Large News (laws in their original form1954 to present federal Register (proposed and newly passed agency rules http://www.gti.net/mocolib1/laws.html

NJ cases NJ courts Municipal codes State resources ... MCL holdings NEW! NJ Construction Codes @MCL. Need a notary? U.S. Constitution Includes text, history, explanation of legal points and major constitutional cases decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. United States Code Full-text searchable version the U.S. Code. Titles 1-50 are updated through January 26, 1998. In order to ensure that a particular section of the law is still in force, it is necessary to search for current legislation using Thomas Thomas 93rd Congress [1973] to present ), produced by the Library of Congress, for the purpose of making federal legislative information freely available to the public via the Internet. Thomas offers information on current bills, recently passed laws, House and Senate voting records, selected full-text committee reports, and the Congressional Record. A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation ), American Memory Collection, Library of Congress. Full-text U.S. Congressional documents and debates, including the Journals of the Continental Congress Code of Federal Regulations This CFR is provided by the U.S. House of Representatives Internet Law Library. It can be searched by topic, keyword or title/section number.

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Page 3     41-60 of 97    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20