61. Commercial Court Procedure Rule / Practice Direction, LCD Updates 2125, Page of Commercial court procedure. claim rule 6.24(1)(b)(ii)(Method of Service - general Provisions) substitute http://www.fountaincourt.co.uk/commercial/page3.htm

Update 5 Contents Overview Table 1 Modernising the Commercial Court Next CCP Update ... Links Commercial Court Procedure 2001 was published by Sweet and Maxwell in November 2000. It includes all the most recent amendments to the CPR and practice directions, recent cases, and up to date commentary. To order click here Overview [Note: References to "LCD Updates" are to changes to the CPR and the Practice Directions as published from time to time by the Lord Chancellor's Department. References to "CCP Updates" are to the corresponding changes to Commercial Court Procedure 2001 as published by Fountain Court shortly after the publication of each LCD update.] This CCP Update 5 incorporates LCD Update 25 (which was published in December 2001) insofar as those changes are relevant to Commercial Court Procedure 2001 . Those changes to the rules and PDs brought about by LCD 25 which are relevant to the CCP came into force on 3 December 2001.

62. Federal Government -- Sources [Law] [ ALSO! -- U.S. Law ] a department of the Army Judge Advocate general s School; (2 Top of Page. United StatesRules of procedure and Practice Online versions of court rules might not http://www.lawsource.com/also/usa.cgi?us1

63. Applicability In General: Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure Applicability in general. States district courts from the state courts and governprocedure after removal. Repleading is not necessary unless the court so orders http://www.personalinjuryattorney.com/injuries/applicability.html

Acquired Brain Injury Airplane Accidents Amusement Park Accidents Auto Accidents ... Zicam Rule 81. Applicability in General (a) Proceedings to which the Rules Apply. (1) These rules do not apply to prize proceedings in admiralty governed by Title 10, U.S.C., §§ 7651–7681. They do apply to proceedings in bankruptcy to the extent provided by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. (2) These rules are applicable to proceedings for admission to citizenship, habeas corpus, and quo warranto, to the extent that the practice in such proceedings is not set forth in statutes of the United States, the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, or the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, and has heretofore conformed to the practice in civil actions. (3) In proceedings under Title 9, USC, relating to arbitration, or under the Act of May 20, 1926, ch 347, § 9 (44 Stat 585), USC, Title 45, § 159, relating to boards of arbitration of railway labor disputes, these rules apply only to the extent that matters of procedure are not provided for in those statutes. These rules apply to proceedings to compel the giving of testimony or production of documents in accordance with a subpoena issued by an officer or agency of the United States under any statute of the United States except as otherwise provided by statute or by rules of the district court or by order of the court in the proceedings. (4) These rules do not alter the method prescribed by the Act of February 18, 1922, c. 57, § 2 (42 Stat 388), USC, Title 7, § 292; or by the Act of June 10, 1930, c. 436, § 7 (46 Stat 534), as amended, USC, Title 7, § 499g(c), for instituting proceedings in the United States district courts to review orders of the Secretary of Agriculture; or prescribed by the Act of June 25, 1934, c. 742, § 2 (48 Stat 1214), USC, Title 15, § 522, for instituting proceedings to review orders of the Secretary of the Interior; or prescribed by the Act of February 22, 1935, c. 18, § 5 (49 Stat 31), USC, Title 15, § 715d(c), as extended, for instituting proceedings to review orders of petroleum control boards; but the conduct of such proceedings in the district courts shall be made to conform to these rules so far as applicable.

64. Web Law Review, Maritime Court And Special Procedure Law, 2001 Maritime Lawsuit is applied with priority and, if it keeps silence, Civil procedureLaw will be referred as general procedure rule when maritime court and high http://www.eaglelink.com/law-review/2w97.html

Maritime Court and Special Procedure Law The Author: Tian Baicheng , a lawyer of Hui Cheng Law Office in Beijing China, served as legal advisor of a state owned freight forwarder company and a ship broking company for almost a dozen years after finishing his Masters Degree on civil procedure law at China Political Science and Law University. He started to be a practice lawyer in 1993 and now is a partner of the law firm. He deals with shipping and trade affairs and has developed investment and immigration business with his foreign counterparts. Intellectual properties and internet are additional areas of his practice. E-mail: tianbcts@public3.bta.net.cn Web: www.eaglelink.com/cheng/ By Tian Baicheng LONG WITH THE RAPID development of China's shipping and foreign trade, internal and external disputes on marine casualties and maritime commerce increasingly arise. As a result, maritime courts were established in principal port cities of China in 1984, in accordance with the decision by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPC). This action was taken in order to exercise China's judicial jurisdiction and to ensure timely trial of those cases to safeguard lawful rights and interests of both Chinese and foreign enterprises, organizations and citizens. The action was also taken to accelerate the development of China's shipping and foreign trade, to ensure the policy of opening door to the outside was carried out, and to invigorate the domestic economy.

65. Tax Court Of Canada Rules (General Procedure)/Tax Court Of Canada Rules (Informa Tax court of Canada Rules (general procedure)/Tax court of Canada Rules(Informal procedure) Shell, SOR/90688. Noteup Whole http://www.canlii.org/ca/regu/sor90-688-1/

Canada Statutes and Regulations Consolidated Regulations of Canada Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure)/Tax Court of Canada Rules (Informal Procedure) [Shell], [SOR/90-688] Noteup Whole document (3 KB)] [Enabling statute: Tax Court of Canada Act Search this Regulation: Find: all of these words this boolean query any of these words this phrase Full Text Titles Only Query: Search help Advanced search Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure)/Tax Court of Canada Rules (Informal Procedure) [Shell] About CanLII ... Contact CanLII

66. Tax Court Of Canada Rules (General Procedure), [SOR/90-688a] Tax court of Canada Rules (general procedure), SOR/90688a. Tax courtof Canada Rules (general procedure). Registration 1 October, 1990. http://www.canlii.org/ca/regu/sor90-688/

Canada Statutes and Regulations Consolidated Regulations of Canada Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure), [SOR/90-688a] Noteup Whole document (280 KB)] [Enabling statute: Tax Court of Canada Act Search this Regulation: Find: all of these words this boolean query any of these words this phrase Full Text Titles Only Query: Search help Advanced search Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure) Registration 1 October, 1990 P.C. 1990-2121 27 September, 1990 CITATION, DEFINITIONS, APPLICATION, INTERPRETATION, FORMS AND CONFERENCE CALLS Short Title Section 1. Definitions Section 2. Application Section 3. Interpretation Section 4. Forms Section 5. Hearings by Conference Telephone Section 6. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES Effect of Non-compliance Section 7. Attacking Irregularity Section 8. Court may Dispense with Compliance Section 9. Remedying Default Section 10. TIME Computation Section 11.

67. Virtual Finland · ARTIKKELIPOHJA In 1734 a general code was adopted in the Kingdom of The rules of procedure includedin the Code contain Act of 1789 mentions the Supreme court of Justice http://virtual.finland.fi/finfo/english/court.html

Mainpage NewsRoom Site Map Contact us About this site Search: Articles General information National symbols History International relations Way of life Famous Finns Picturebook Events in Finland Travel information The Finnish Court System Written for Virtual Finland by Prof. Emeritus Tore Modeen, October 1999. Background © Unionimedia In 1809 Finland became a Grand Duchy under Russian rule. It was then given the privilege to function as an autonomous province and to retain its (Swedish) legal system. The courts of law situated in Finland simply continued to function with the same powers and applying the same legal rules as before. But as the Supreme Court in Stockholm had lost its jurisdiction over Finland, the Russian Emperor had to create a corresponding body for his Finnish Grand Duchy, namely the Judicial Department of the Finnish Senate. The Swedish Code of 1734 thus continued to serve as the law of Finland. Even today, some two hundred years after the separation of the two countries, the rules of procedure of 1734 have not, contrary to the situation in Sweden, yet been formally abolished in Finland. It is, however, obvious that only the old frame and a few articles of the Code remain in force. The contents of the Code have been revised in order to meet the requirements of a modern society. The court system of Finland has recently been reformed and thus bears very little resemblance to the system established in 1734.

68. 8 California Procedure (4th), Attack On Judgment In Trial Court (d) §16 court of Limited or Special Jurisdiction. 4. §17 Other Limitations.II. 3. §20 Statutory procedure Mandatory. (a) §22 In general. http://www.witkin.com/pages/witkin_library_pages/outlines/PROC/Attack.htm

8 California Procedure (4th), Attack on Judgment in Trial Court I. INTRODUCTION A. Direct Attack. 1. [§1] Nature and Significance of Concept. 2. Methods of Direct Attack. (a) [§2] In Trial Court. (b) [§3] In Reviewing Court. (c) [§4] Coram Nobis and Coram Vobis. 3. [§5] Presumption of Jurisdiction. B. Collateral Attack. 1. [§6] Nature and Significance of Concept. 2. Illustrations. (a) [§7] Subsequent Action. (b) [§8] Subsequent Motion. (c) [§9] Trial Court's Own Motion. (d) [§10] Collateral Attack in Reviewing Court. 3. Limitation: Presumption of Jurisdiction. (a) [§11] In General. (b) [§12] Lack of Jurisdiction Shown by Record. (c) Exception: Showing by Extrinsic Evidence. (1) [§13] Waiver. (2) [§14] Foreign Judgment. (3) [§15] Judgment Against Dead Person or Dissolved Corporation. (d) [§16] Court of Limited or Special Jurisdiction. 4. [§17] Other Limitations. II. MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL A. In General. 1. [§18] Nature and Object of Motion. 2. [§19] Statutory Grounds Exclusive. 3. [§20] Statutory Procedure Mandatory. 4. [§21] Necessity for Objection. 5. Proceedings in Which New Trial May Be Had.

69. 2 California Procedure (4th), Courts D. procedure in Small Claims court. 1. § 294 In general. 2. § 295Venue and Sessions. 3. Plaintiff s Claim. (a) § 296 In general. http://www.witkin.com/pages/witkin_library_pages/outlines/PROC/Courts.htm

2 California Procedure (4th), Courts I. INTRODUCTION A. Judges. 1. Selection. (a) Reviewing Courts. (1) [§ 1] In General. (2) [§ 2] Confirmation Election. (3) [§ 3] Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation. (b) [§ 4] Superior Court. (c) [§ 5] Municipal Court. (d) [§ 6] Local Bar Association Evaluation. (e) [§ 7] Reform in Judicial Selection. 2. Qualification. (a) [§ 8] Reviewing Courts and Superior Court. (b) [§ 9] Municipal Court. 3. Compensation. (a) [§ 10] Sitting Judges. (b) Retired Judges. (1) [§ 11] In General. (2) [§ 12] Retired Judge Sitting by Assignment. (c) [§ 13] Compensation Suspended for Delay in Deciding Cases. 4. Assignment of Judges by Chief Justice. (a) [§ 14] Constitutional Basis of Power. (b) [§ 15] Manner of Selection of Judges. (c) [§ 16] Judge Assigned. 5. Termination of Office. (a) [§ 17] In General. (b) [§ 18] Voluntary Retirement for Age or Disability. (c) [§ 19] Senior Status. 6. Invalid Selection or Holding Over: De Facto Judge. (a) [§ 20] General Rule. (b) [§ 21] Exceptions. 7. Authority of Successor Judge. (a) [§ 22] What Successor Cannot Do.

70. Historical Background, Organisation And Procedure President, VicePresidents and Section Presidents. B. procedure beforethe court. 1. general. 13. Any Contracting State (State application http://www.echr.coe.int/Eng/EDocs/HistoricalBackground.htm

September 2003 Information document issued by the Registrar of the European Court of Human Rights THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS Historical background, organisation and procedure The European Convention on Human Rights Subsequent developments Organisation of the Court Procedure before the Court ... Appendix I - Headings of substantive Articles of the European Convention Appendix II - Composition of the Court the list of headings of substantive Articles ) the Convention set up a mechanism for the enforcement of the obligations entered into by Contracting States. Three institutions were entrusted with this responsibility: the European Commission of Human Rights (set up in 1954), the European Court of Human Rights (set up in 1959) and the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, the latter organ being composed of the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the member States or their representatives. the right of individual application was, however, optional and it could therefore be exercised only against those States which had accepted it (Protocol No. 11 to the Convention was subsequently to make its acceptance compulsory, see paragraph 6 below). If a case was not referred to the Court, the Committee of Ministers decided whether there had been a violation of the Convention and, if appropriate, awarded "just satisfaction" to the victim. The Committee of Ministers also had responsibility for supervising the execution of the Court’s judgments.

71. Hamilton Co. Court Of Appeals - Rules 18, court Record Retention. general RULES OF APPELLATE procedure EffectiveJuly, 1971 Including amendments received through July 15, 1998. Rule, http://www.hamilton-co.org/appealscourt/rules.html

LOCAL RULES OF THE FIRST APPELLATE JUDICIAL DISTRICT [HAMILTON COUNTY] GENERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE LOCAL RULES OF THE FIRST APPELLATE JUDICIAL DISTRICT [HAMILTON COUNTY] RULE Costs Deposit in Original Actions Evidence in Original Actions Designation of Counsel Motions ... Court Record Retention GENERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE Effective July, 1971 Including amendments received through July 15, 1998 Rule Title I APPLICABILITY OF RULES App R 1 Scope of Rules App R 2 Law and Fact Appeals Abolished Title II APPEALS FROM JUDGEMENTS AND ORDERS OF COURT RECORD App R 3 Appeal as of Right-How Taken App R 4 Appeal as of Right-When Taken App R 5 Appeals by Leave of Court in Criminal Cases App R 6 Concurrent Jurisdiction in Criminal Actions App R 7 Stay or Injunction Pending Appeal-Civil and Juvenile Action App R 8 Bail and Suspension of Execution of Sentence in Criminal Cases App R 9 The Record on Appeal App R 10 Transmission of the Record App R 11 Docketing the Appeal; Filing of the Record

72. ARTILCE I - RULES OF PROCEDURE - COURT OF JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE - COMMONWEALTH OF IN general. RULE 101. TITLE AND CITATION OF RULES. These rules shall be known asthe court of Judicial Discipline Rules of procedure and may be cited as CJDRP http://www.cjdpa.org/rules/article1.html

Rules of Procedure Click on a chapter name to jump directly to that section Article I. - Chapter 1. - GENERAL PROVISIONS Article I. - Chapter 2. - DECISIONS Article II. - Chapter 3. - INITIATION OF FORMAL CHARGES Article II. - Chapter 4. - PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS ... Article III. - Chapter 8. - EMERGENCY RELIEF Adopted November 1, 1994 Effective January 1, 1995 ARTICLE 1. PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS IN GENERAL RULE 101. TITLE AND CITATION OF RULES. These rules shall be known as the Court of Judicial Discipline Rules of Procedure and may be cited as "C.J.D.R.P. No. ." Adopted November 1, 1994, effective January 1, 1995. RULE 102. DEFINITIONS. The following words and phrases when used in these rules shall have the following meanings, unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires: Board is the Judicial Conduct Board. Board Complaint is the formal charging document filed by the Board to initiate proceedings in the Court pursuant to Article V, §18(b)(5) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Charges are the formal charges contained in the Board Complaint filed with the Court by the Board alleging that a judicial officer has been convicted of a felony, violated Article V, §17 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, engaged in misconduct in office, neglected or failed to perform the duties of office or engaged in conduct which prejudiced the proper administration of justice or brought the judicial office into disrepute, violated a canon of legal or judicial ethics or standards of conduct or a rule of the Supreme Court, or that the judicial officer is mentally or physically disabled.

73. North Carolina Divorce Law - The NC Divorce Law Site Important examples of rules of this type are the general Rules of Practice forthe Superior and District Courts and the Rules of Appellate procedure. http://www.rosen.com/ppf/ID/52/c_proced.asp

Choose from the links to the right to jump to the sections of this page that you are interested in viewing or simply scroll down the page. A. Pleadings and Service of Process B. Venue and Jurisdiction C. Discovery D. Hearings and Trial ... E. Appeal With the possible exception of the court papers required to obtain an absolute divorce, the procedure for drafting, filing and serving most other litigation documents is too complex and too fraught with legal peril to be attempted by even the most educated laypersons. The law has many hypertechnical rules that cannot be understood, or sufficiently mastered, without long legal study. The technical rules of the legal system govern not only what is known as the "substance" of an area of the law, such as child support, but also what is know as the "procedure." The substance of the law of separation and divorce has been discussed in the separation section of this website. Now we turn to the procedural law, or the system of rules for having substantive law declared and enforced by the court system. Put most simply, procedure is the entire body of rules directing litigants about how to use the judicial system. The rules dictate, for instance, who can file a claim or some other paper, when it can be filed, where it must be filed, how it must be filed in order to be validly brought before the court, how it can be served on the other party, the time limits for responses to the claim, how a hearing is to be noticed, how a trial is to be conducted, how a remedy granted by the court is to be enforced, and similar matters. The principal peril in failing to appreciate such procedural rules is the dismissal of a litigant's claim for lack of adherence to the rules or, possibly worse, the imposition of sanctions against a litigant who makes an inappropriate move at the courthouse in terms of procedure.

74. West Group - Nebraska Court Rules And Procedure, State And Federal court Forms; Grandparents Visitation; District court Pretrial procedure;County court general Rules Appendices. Forms—County court http://west.thomson.com/store/SummaryOfContents.asp?product_id=22031178&

75. WEST VIRGINIA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, XI General Provisions Applicability in general. to the extent that in the opinion of the court their application orwould work injustice, in which event the former procedure applies http://www.state.wv.us/wvsca/rules/civilproc/XI.htm

XI. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 81. Applicability in general. (a) To what proceedings applicable. — (1) Review of decisions of magistrates and administrative agencies. — When the appeal of a case has been granted or perfected, these rules apply, except that, in a case on appeal from a magistrate court, Rules 26 through 37 may not be used and no pleadings other than those used in the case in the magistrate court may be used except by order of the appellate court in the proceeding after the appeal has been granted or perfected. Likewise, these rules, where applicable, apply in a trial court of record when any testimony is taken before the court in the judicial review of an order or decision rendered by an administrative agency. (4) Ex parte proceedings. — Rules 5(b), 5(e) and 80 apply to ex parte proceedings. The other rules do not apply to such proceedings except by order of the court for cause shown in the proceeding and only to the extent provided by the order. Such proceedings include, but are not limited to, adoption; change of name; statutory summary procedure for the sale, lease, or encumbrance of property of persons under legal disability; or statutory summary procedure for the sale, lease, or other conveyance of property subject to future interests; or statutory summary procedure for the compromise and settlement of claims by a guardian or committee for personal injuries sustained by the guardian’s or committee’s ward.

76. HandBook Of Operating Procedure - General Provisions Handbook of Operating procedures 10 general PROVISIONS Effective upon the order ofa court of competent information obtained through this procedure be placed http://www.it.utep.edu/hoop/Section_V-Human_Resources.htm

77. The Courts Of Nova Scotia, Civil Procedure Rules 29 TRIAL SITTINGS Rule 30 - TRIAL PROCEDURES Rule 31 RECEIVERS Rule 47 - SALESBY THE court Rule 48 ORDERS Rule 52 - ENFORCEMENT OF ORDERS general Rule 53 http://www.courts.ns.ca/Rules/toc.htm

RESOURCES Civil Procedure Rules Conduct of Judges Court Locations - Map Family Services ... Home The Civil Procedure Rules govern proceedings in the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, including the Family Division of the Supreme Court. The Civil Procedure Rules are made and amended by the Judges of the Supreme and Appeal Courts under the authority of the Judicature Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 240, s. 46. These Rules are current to November 26, 2003 [the date of publication in the Royal Gazette]. Practice Memoranda , Table of Contents For your information: Pursuant to section 51 of the Judicature Act, all changes to the Civil Procedure Rules must be placed before the House of Assembly within 20 days after the changes have been made. Pursuant to section 47 of the Judicature Act, all changes to the Civil Procedure Rules must be published in the Royal Gazette and are effective the date of publication in the Royal Gazette. See An Introduction to the Civil Procedure Rules For information on a planned comprehensive review and revision of the Rules click here TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1 - CITATION, APPLICATION AND INTERPRETATION

78. Small Claims Court Procedures of the judgment, the judgment creditor may contact the general district court clerk soffice for additional information on court procedures to collect the http://www.courts.state.va.us/pamphlets/small_claims.html

Virginia's Judicial System Contents An Overview of Small Claims Litigation Preparing To File Suit In Small Claims Court Filing Suit In Small Claims Court Service of Process ... Enforcing the Judgment Small Claims Court Procedures Small Claims Divisions became mandatory on July 1, 1999. An Overview of Small Claims Litigation The "jurisdiction" of a court is the power of that court to hear and decide a particular type of case. The small claims court has jurisdiction over civil cases in which the plaintiff is seeking a money judgment up to $2,000 or recovery of personal property valued up to $2,000. In trials before the small claims court, witnesses shall be sworn. The judge shall conduct the trial in an informal manner so as to do substantial justice between the parties. The judges shall have the discretion to admit all evidence which may be of probative value although not in accordance with formal rules of practice, procedure, pleading or evidence, except that privileged communications shall not be admissible. The object of such trials shall be to determine the rights of the litigants on the merits and to dispense expeditious justice between the parties. The successful plaintiff in a civil case will in most cases be awarded a money judgment as compensation for the defendant's wrongful act. The judgment is judicial recognition that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff for a particular sum of money. The plaintiff is never assured of actually receiving the money, however, since the judgment can only be enforced out of property belonging to the defendant. Remedies to enforce judgments are available, but a defendant in a civil case is not subject to criminal sanctions for failing to pay a money judgment.

79. USDC - District Of Maine Offers general information about court administration and procedures as well as access to local rules and opinions. http://www.med.uscourts.gov/

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE Established by the Judiciary Act of 1789 document.write(" ****Attention: In accordance with the declaration of President Bush that June 11, 2004 will be a National Day of Mourning out of respect for President Reagan, the court will be closed on Friday**** ") Pattern Jury Instructions General Information Attorney Admission Operations and Filing ... Links Portland Head Light

80. About The Supreme Court Of Virginia published by the court system in another format or who have general questions aboutthe court system s nondiscrimination policies and procedures may contact http://www.courts.state.va.us/scov/cover.htm

The Supreme Court of Virginia Contents: History Jurisdiction Procedure Court Organization ... Individuals With Disabilities History The Supreme Court of Virginia is one of the oldest continuous judicial bodies in the United States. Its roots are deep in the English legal system dating to the early seventeenth century as part of the Charter of 1606 under which Jamestown, the first permanent English settlement in North America, was established. In 1623, the Virginia House of Burgesses created a five man appellate court which met quarterly to hear appeals from the lower courts. Meeting on the first day of March, June, September, and December, it became known as the Quarter Court. The June term became unnecessary over the years, and in 1661, the Quarter Court became the General Court with original and appellate jurisdiction in both civil and criminal matters. It was a court of last resort for the Virginia colonists except in those rare circumstances when an appeal could be made to the King in England. Its members were appointed by the King on the basis of social standing, property, and the proximity of their estates to the Williamsburg capital. Though the judges were generally most capable, the majority possessed no formal legal training. At the close of the Revolutionary War, the court system was reorganized. An act of the new General Assembly in 1779 created four superior courts, including the Supreme Court of Appeals, to be composed of judges of the other three existing courts: the Admiralty, the General, and the Chancery Courts. The Supreme Court of Appeals, which served as a model for the United States Supreme Court, first convened in Williamsburg on August 30, 1779. Shortly thereafter, the Court was moved to Richmond and held its sessions in the Henrico County Courthouse. Its jurisdiction was primarily appellate, and its members were elected by the legislature.

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Page 4     61-80 of 153    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6  | 7  | 8  | Next 20