21. Anti-Family Canadian Supreme Court Justice Louise Arbour Nominated As United Nat AntiFamily canadian supreme court Justice Louise Arbour Nominated asUnited Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. OTTAWA, February http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/feb/04022001.html

June CLC National News - Special Election Emphasis May Interim on line CLC Canadian Election Candidate Evaluation page delayed until early next week to ensure accuracy and completeness MP Voting Records ... Very revealing LifeSiteNews population control document A MUST READ Politics International What Can I Do? Educational Information News Partners Culture Features Crisis Pregnancy Support Search LifeSite: Free Daily Updates New on LifeSite ... Site Map Friday February 20, 2004 Printer friendly version Email to a friend Anti-Family Canadian Supreme Court Justice Louise Arbour Nominated as United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights OTTAWA, February 20, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Canadian Supreme Court Justice Louise Arbour has been nominated today to the post of United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan. Justice Arbour is expected to retire from the Supreme Court of Canada to take up her post in Geneva in late June. As described by LifeSiteNews.com last week, while the development may be welcome news to social conservatives in Canada who will see at least one radical leftist judge leave the Supreme Court, from her new post, Arbour will now tax pro-family supporters the world over. Justice Arbour's anti-family legacy as a Canadian Supreme Court Justice includes the legalization of lap-dancing; she has ruled in favour of common-law relationships, being in at least one herself; in a 1992 insurance case, she ruled that laws should not discriminate against common-law couples as compared to married couples; and in the recent Canadian Supreme Court decision on the use of spanking by parents as a form of discipline, justice Arbour was the only one among Canada's nine radical Supreme Court Justices to insist on total criminalization of all spanking.

22. Canadian Supreme Court Refuses To Criminalize Parents Use Of Spanking canadian supreme court Refuses to Criminalize Parents Use of Spanking.Former Top UN Judge Would Have Seen Parents in Jail for Spanking. http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/jan/04013002.html

June CLC National News - Special Election Emphasis May Interim on line CLC Canadian Election Candidate Evaluation page delayed until early next week to ensure accuracy and completeness MP Voting Records ... Very revealing LifeSiteNews population control document A MUST READ Politics International What Can I Do? Educational Information News Partners Culture Features Crisis Pregnancy Support Search LifeSite: Free Daily Updates New on LifeSite ... Site Map Friday January 30, 2004 Printer friendly version Email to a friend Canadian Supreme Court Refuses to Criminalize Parents Use of Spanking Former Top UN Judge Would Have Seen Parents in Jail for Spanking OTTAWA, January 30, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In a 6-3 decision rendered today, the Supreme Court of Canada turned down an attempt by an activist group to criminalize parental use of spanking as a form of disciplining their children. The ruling is a victory for parents, said representatives of the Coalition for Family Autonomy (CFA) - one of the groups intervening in the case. Of note, only one justice was strident in insisting on criminalization spanking by parents - justice Louise Arbour. Arbour's opinion comes as no surprise to UN watchers since she was at one time the United Nations' top judge - the UN's chief prosecutor in the International War Criminal Tribunal. The United Nations has for years insisted that Canada, and all countries, prohibit parents from using spanking as a form of discipline. The U.N. has also been advocating many other restrictions on the rights of parents to raise their children according to their own cultural, religious and personal beliefs.

23. KRVN 880 Rural Radio - KRVN Agricultural News canadian supreme court rules against farmer accused by Monsanto of. OTTAWA (AP) Canada s top court ruled Friday against a farmer accused by Monsanto Co. http://www.krvn.com/news/agricultural/index.cfm?ID=4450

24. M - V. - H. (Canadian Supreme Court) Full text of the May 1999 canadian supreme court ruling granting gayand lesbian partners equality with unmarried heterosexual couples. http://www.pfc.org.uk/legal/m-and-h.htm

Books Campaign Congress Employment ... Home Search: See also: Supreme Court ruling redefines family CBC News A spouse is a spouse regardless of gender Globe Mail Gay couples win rights Globe Mail M v. H Canadian Supreme Court grants gay and lesbian partners equality with unmarried heterosexual couples May 1999 This ground-breaking judgment by Canada's Supreme Court means that Canadians in gay and lesbian relationships have the same rights and protection under the law as unmarried heterosexual couples. The full text of the judgment is very big: over 400Kb. This would take quite a while to download on a modem link, and since Press for Changes pays for the bandwidth used, it would be expensive for us to provide it in this way. So we've therefore made the full judgment available in compressed format, which you can download and read off-line. We've included two versions: PkZIP , which can be decompressed on a Windows PC with the widely-used WinZip utility, which you can evaluate free of charge. GnuZIP , which can be decompressed with the GZIP utility widely used on UNIX systems. If you would prefer to view the full document on-line, you'll find the original at the Canadian Supreme Court's website

25. POT-TV: The Canadian Supreme Court Demonstrates Canada's Lack Of Justice The canadian supreme court Demonstrates Canada s Lack of Justice The CanadianSupreme Court Cannabis Law Challenge with PotTV. Running Time 1 hr 0 min. http://www.pot-tv.net/archive/shows/pottvshowse-2384.html

Pot-TV News Marc Emery Grow Show Hilary Black ... HOT BOX Comics NEW! Monday, June 7 Best Of Pot-TV Volume 3: Grower's Special only at the CC Store! Nebula Emeryseeds! The Canadian Supreme Court Demonstrates Canada's Lack of Justice The Canadian Supreme Court Cannabis Law Challenge with Pot-TV Running Time: 1 hr min Date Entered: 23 Dec 2003 Viewer Rating: 9.23 (22 votes) Number of Views: Recorded from a Live Pot TV broadcast. In a devastating decision the prohibitionist core of the Canadian Justice System Rules in Favor of criminalizing millions of Canadians for using cannabis. Pot-TV More shows from The Canadian Supreme Court Cannabis Law Challenge email to a friend Re: The Canadian Supreme Court Demonstrates Canada skellington, Tue Dec 23 21:06:15 2003 you guys done good...david and randy and chris and marc and john and paul and EVERYONE else involved did a fantastic job! thank you from the bottom of my heart Re: The Canadian Supreme Court Demonstrates Canada's Lack of Justice GanjaGardener420, Tue Dec 23 20:34:44 2003 One way we can at least capitalize on this situation a bit is to take advantage of the media attention that will be givin to this. This is gonna be a hot topic in the media for a little bit so ink up that quill and make your voice heard. I have some previously prepared letters I am going to send out now. The key is to hit them hard now since the medias attention span is very short. so roll a few and start bloting up that parchment NOW!

26. POT-TV Internetwork POTTV Series The canadian supreme court Cannabis Law Challenge.6 of 7 1-6 7-7. The canadian supreme court Demonstrates Canada s http://www.pot-tv.net/archive/series/pottvseries-109.html

Pot-TV News Marc Emery Grow Show Hilary Black ... HOT BOX Comics NEW! Monday, June 7 POT-TV Series The Canadian Supreme Court Cannabis Law Challenge 6 of 7 The Canadian Supreme Court Demonstrates Canada's Lack of Justice The Supreme Court Upholds The Supreme Lie! Recorded from a Live Pot TV broadcast. In a devastating decision the prohibitionist core of the Canadian Justice System Rules in Favor of criminalizing millions of Canadians for using cannabis. The Canadian Supreme Court Cannabis Law Challenge: Interviews Some of the main players in the Canadian Supreme Court Cannabis Challenge, share their views both before and after the preceedings. Filmed by Kai. The Canadian Supreme Court Cannabis Law Challenge Part 5: Closing Arguements S. David frankel continues with his assault on Liberty and Freedom, and John Conroy, David Malmo-Levine and Paul Burstein present their closing arguements. The Canadian Supreme Court Cannabis Law Challenge Part 4: S.David Frankel Representing the Canadian Department of Justice, S. David Frankel argues for the constitutionality of the present Marijuana Laws, and pleas to the Judges to acknowledge the current laws on the books as they stand and leave any changes to Parliament The Canadian Supreme Court Cannabis Law Challenge: John Conroy John Conroy, Lawyer to the Pot-Stars, presents his views on the unconstitutionality of the current Canadian cannabis laws to the Supreme Court.

27. Canadian Bishops On Supreme Court Abortion Decision (January 28, 1988) Canadian conference of Catholic Bishops, issued the following statement on 28 January1988 following the announcement of a canadian supreme court decision on http://www.priestsforlife.org/magisterium/hayes88-01-28canada.htm

January 1988 President of Canadian Episcopal Conference on Supreme Court decision on abortion Archbishop James Hayes, president of the Canadian conference of Catholic Bishops, issued the following statement on 28 January 1988 following the announcement of a Canadian Supreme Court decision on abortion laws. The Supreme Court decision striking down the abortion law is a dramatic challenge to all lay members of the Church and to all of us their pastors. The need for responsible political action was never more urgent. For God's law condemning abortion is not changed by the Supreme Court decision. In the process of writing a new law that protects human life from conception, lay Christians as voters and legislators have the first responsibility. The situation of "abortion on demand" that follows from the Court's decision must be corrected legislatively as soon as possible. This is our common task now, and the future of our human society depends on how soon and how well it is done. In the process of working for new legislation, all Christians must also apply themselves to the continuing pastoral work of evangelizing modern culture regarding the God-given values and rights of every human life, and the need to safeguard and respect that life in all circumstances. Abortion is the destruction of human life. The challenge is to change our society's attitude towards life and to channel the energies and strong emotions involved in this debate towards correcting mentalities and situations that lead to abortion. We need to create a society that supports life and enables children to be raised with dignity; a society that puts other people's rights and needs ahead of personal comfort and gain; a society that respects human life at every stage of its development.

28. Canadian Supreme Court To Define ISP Role canadian supreme court To Define ISP Role. canadian supreme court To Define ISPRole. From Slashdot. Similar Items canadian supreme court To Define ISP Role. http://www.stargeek.com/item/34175.html

stargeek home PHP scripts articles seo tools ... shop Canadian Supreme Court To Define ISP Role Canadian Supreme Court To Define ISP Role From: Slashdot Canadian Supreme Court To Define ISP Role document.write('Click here for great deals on Salvia - IamShaman'); This is a GrokNews Entry: ( what is grok? No Comments yet. Add A New Comment Name: Email Address: (it will not be displayed) Send me information on updates at stargeek.com: Title: Comments: Similar Items Canadian Supreme Court To Define ISP Role Monsanto Prevails in Patent Fight From: Monsanto Prevails in Patent Fight The Canadian Supreme Court says Percy Schmeiser stole Monsanto's biotech canola seed, but waives $200,000 in profits and court costs the company asked for. The ramifications for farmers go far beyond this case. By Kristen Philipkoski. Supreme Court hears appeals from Guantanamo detainees (USATODAY.com) From: Supreme Court hears appeals from Guantanamo detainees (USATODAY.com) USATODAY.com - Several Supreme Court justices expressed skepticism Tuesday about the Bush administration's effort to block court hearings for nearly 600 foreigners who are being held at a military base in Cuba as part of an anti-terrorism policy. Supreme Court will revisit execution of teenage killers (USATODAY.com)

29. Politech: Canadian Supreme Court Toughens Wiretap Rules Politech canadian supreme court toughens wiretap rules. From DeclanMcCullagh (declan_at_well.com) Date Dec 16 2000. Next message http://seclists.org/lists/politech/2000/Dec/0051.html

Nmap stealth port scanner Intro Docs Download ... Credits Politech: Canadian supreme court toughens wiretap rules From: Declan McCullagh ( declan_at_well.com Date: Dec 16 2000 Next message: Declan McCullagh: ""Amy Boyer law" yanked from appropriations bill, by A.Marlin/CQ" Previous message: Declan McCullagh: "Amy Boyer's father responds to Privacilla report" Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] ... declan_at_well.com >where "other investigative procedures are unlikely to succeed." >wiretap must show that "there is no other reasonable alternative method of Opinion: http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/rec/html/grandmai.en.html R. v. Araujo Angela Araujo, Spencer Leslie, Appellants Neil Grandmaison, Christina Khoury, Victor Camara, Robert Jenkins, Tiffany Muriel Leslie, Kevin Lathangue and Jolene Irons v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Araujo Neutral citation: 2000 SCC 65. File Nos.: 26899, 26904, 26898, 26943, 26968. 2000: April 11, 12; 2000: December 14. Present: McLachlin C.J. and L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major

30. WVA News: Canadian Supreme Court Rules Against Farmer In Biotech Dispute - - The canadian supreme court rules against farmer in biotech dispute. ByCOLIN McCLELLAND. OTTAWA (AP) Canada s top court ruled Friday http://www.oweb.com/inter/story/05222004_intCanada-BiotechDispute-P0637.asp

Canadian Supreme Court rules against farmer in biotech dispute By COLIN McCLELLAND OTTAWA (AP) - Canada's top court ruled Friday against a farmer accused of patent infringement for using a genetically engineered seed that he insisted had arrived on his field by accident. The Supreme Court of Canada upheld a lower court ruling in favor of Monsanto Co., which makes a canola variety found on the Saskatchewan farm of Percy Schmeiser. The canola was engineered to resist the U.S. company's powerful Roundup weedkiller. The seven-year legal battle has become a cause for biotechnology opponents and proponents around the globe, dating to 1997 when Monsanto found the gene-altered plant growing on the farm. Some farmers, especially those from developing nations, fear that natural or accidental contamination of their conventional crops with biotech varieties will give biotech companies like Monsanto licenses to seize their crops. Further, the case also highlighted the growing concern among organic farmers and other conventional growers over controlling the accidental spread of genetically engineered crops into their fields. Consumers pay a premium for organic food, but a number of farmers are finding trace amounts of genetically engineered crops in their fields, raising liability issues for biotech companies. Conventional farmers fear biotech-averse consumers, especially in Europe, will reject their crops if they're found to be widely cross-pollinated with genetically engineered plants.

31. Landscape Management - Canadian Supreme Court Upholds Quebec Ban canadian supreme court upholds Quebec ban on residential use of pesticides. Decisionmay give broad control to Canadian municipal authorities. June 29, 2001. http://www.landscapemanagement.net/landscape/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=35815

32. Traditional Values Coalition - Anti-Family Canadian Supreme Court Judge Heads To TVC Weekly News AntiFamily canadian supreme court Judge Heads To UNPost. Homosexual AgendaSummary LifeSite News reported on February http://www.traditionalvalues.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1419

33. Traditional Values Coalition - Anti-Family Canadian Supreme Court Judge Heads To AntiFamily canadian supreme court Judge Heads To UN Post Date Thursday,February 12 @ 214452 CST Topic Homosexual Agenda. Summary http://www.traditionalvalues.org/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid=1419

34. MercuryNews.com | 05/21/2004 | Canadian Supreme Court Rules Against Farmer In Bi Posted on Fri, May. 21, 2004. canadian supreme court rules against farmer in biotechdispute. OTTAWA (AP) Canada s highest court sided Friday with Monsanto Co. http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthsuperior/business/technology/8724107.htm

Search: Articles-last 7 days Articles-older than 7 days The Web for News Business Sports Entertainment ... Homes var request_url = escape(document.location.href); var request_domain = ".duluthsuperior.com"; News Business Financial Markets Technology ... Weather Duluth Minneapolis/St. Paul Kansas City Local Events Yellow Pages Discussion Boards Back to Home ... Business Monday, Jun 07, 2004 Technology email this print this Posted on Fri, May. 21, 2004 Canadian Supreme Court rules against farmer in biotech dispute OTTAWA (AP) Canada's highest court sided Friday with Monsanto Co. in a seven-year dispute over technology in farming, giving the agribusiness titan broad rights under patent law to control its genetically engineered crops. The Supreme Court of Canada rejected a Saskatchewan farmer's contention that he was an innocent bystander and should not have to pay for seeds he insists had arrived on his field by accident. The legal battle dates to 1997 when Monsanto found on Percy Schmeiser's farm a canola variety the U.S. company had engineered to resist its powerful Roundup weedkiller. Some farmers, especially those from developing nations, fear that natural or accidental contamination of their conventional crops with biotech varieties will give biotech companies like Monsanto licenses to seize their crops.

35. Canadian Supreme Court Upholds GlaxoSmithKline's Canadian AZT Patent canadian supreme court Upholds GlaxoSmithKline s Canadian AZT Patent Canada sSupreme Court on Thursday upheld GlaxoSmithKline s Canadian patent on the http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/hiv_and_aids/public/121102c.html

Canadian Supreme Court Upholds GlaxoSmithKline's Canadian AZT Patent Canada's Supreme Court on Thursday upheld GlaxoSmithKline's Canadian patent on the antiretroviral drug AZT, disallowing generic competition and forcing two generic companies to reimburse GlaxoSmithKline for the money it lost while they produced generic versions of the drug, Toronto's Globe and Mail reports. The court ruled that GlaxoSmithKline's 20-year patent, granted in 1985, on AZT known generically as zidovudine is valid, even though the company had not conducted clinical trials on effectiveness of zidovudine in fighting HIV/AIDS when it applied for the patent. Two Canadian generic drug companies, Apotex and Novopharm, contended GlaxoSmithKline applied for a patent for AZT because it "only speculated" the drug would be effective against HIV/AIDS and had "improperly" claimed credit for discovering the drug's formulation (Lewis, National Post , 12/6/02). The generic drug companies said that because the NIH was "instrumental" in getting zidovudine recognized as a "genuine" HIV/AIDS drug, GlaxoSmithKline's patent was invalid, the

36. LEGO.com About Us - LEGO Company - PressRoom April 29 2004 canadian supreme court grants LEGO Company leave to appeal The SupremeCourt of Canada has issued a judgment on April 29, 2004 granting LEGO http://www.lego.com/eng/info/default.asp?page=pressdetail&contentid=9238&country

37. Canadian Supreme Court Hears Arguments Against Spanking canadian supreme court hears arguments against spanking By Jim Brown,CP The London Free Press, June 6, 2003 OTTAWA Antispanking http://www.nospank.net/n-k47.htm

Canadian Supreme Court hears arguments against spanking By Jim Brown, CP The London Free Press , June 6, 2003 OTTAWA Anti-spanking advocates carried their cause to the country's highest court yesterday, arguing corporal punishment of children should be outlawed as an affront to human dignity. "This case is about the right of children not to be hit, a right that in a modern, 21st-century democracy should be unquestioned," lawyer Paul Schabas told the Supreme Court of Canada. He got a skeptical reception from some of the nine judges, who sharply questioned his legal reasoning. He also met vigorous opposition from the federal government, which maintained that, whatever the merits or pitfalls of spanking, parents should be free to resort to it in "mild to moderate" measure. At issue is Section 43 of the Criminal Code, enacted more than a century ago, which protects parents, teachers and caregivers from prosecution for using "reasonable" force to discipline children. Children's advocacy group the Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law wants that immunity struck down as a violation of the Charter of Rights. "Section 43 has the effect of making children second-class citizens," Schabas said on behalf of the foundation.

38. CNN - Canadian Supreme Court Says Laws Must Recognize Gay Partners - May 20, 199 Keyword. canadian supreme court says laws must recognize gay partners.Landmark ruling strikes down current definition of spouse. http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/americas/9905/20/canada.gay.right/

[an error occurred while processing this directive] MAIN PAGE WORLD africa americas ... news quiz CNN WEB SITES: TIME INC. SITES: Go To ... Time.com People Money Fortune EW MORE SERVICES: video on demand video archive audio on demand news email services ... pointcast DISCUSSION: message boards chat feedback SITE GUIDES: help contents search FASTER ACCESS: europe japan WEB SERVICES: Keyword Title Author Canadian Supreme Court says laws must recognize gay partners Landmark ruling strikes down current definition of spouse May 20, 1999 Web posted at: 6:07 p.m. EDT (2207 GMT) In this story: Ontario premier says he'll abide by ruling Lesbian alimony dispute triggered case RELATED STORIES, SITES OTTAWA (CNN) In a landmark gay rights ruling that could have ramifications across Canada, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Ontario's legal definition of a spouse as someone of the opposite sex is unconstitutional. The high court, by an 8-to-1 vote, gave Canada's most populous province six months to amend its Family Law Act to recognize same-sex couples. However, the court stressed that the ruling should not be construed as giving same-sex couples the right to marry. The decision was the Supreme Court's most definitive ruling yet on the legal rights of gays and lesbians in Canada. While Thursday's ruling applies directly only to Ontario, observers believe it could mean that hundreds of laws on both the federal and provincial levels will have to be rewritten.

39. Canadian Supreme Court Revenue Law Stamps SUPREME COURT 1876 YOUNG QUEEN VICTORIA. USA $, Canadian $. van Dam catalog , face value, colour, uncan, used, uncan, used. 1876 YOUNG QUEEN VICTORIA, http://www.esjvandam.com/revenues/federal/supreme_court.htm

Canadian Supreme Court revenue law stamps Home Up Canada bill stamps Canadian Gas inspection revenue stamps ... Canadian Weights and Measures revenue stamps [ Canadian Supreme Court revenue law stamps ] Canada Customs Duty revenue stamps Canadian War Tax revenue stamps Canada excise tax revenue stamps Canadian War Savings stamps ... Canadian Telephone and Telegraph franks and stamps SUPREME COURT - 1876 YOUNG QUEEN VICTORIA USA $ Canadian $ van Dam catalog # face value colour uncan used uncan used 1876 YOUNG QUEEN VICTORIA blue blue blue blue blue blue 1897 WIDOW QUEEN VICTORIA blue,wet print blue,dry print,wider blue blue black blue black 1915 GEORGE V blue rouletted (blue) rouletted (purple) blue (red) blue (purple) blue, wet print, low # dry print, wider 1935 GEORGE V. blue slate dark blue on $1 slate, horiz. bars on $1 vertical bars (blue 1938-1967 GEORGE VI. blue slate dark blue, yellow gum on 10c slate on 10c, silver o/p doubled silver overprint blue blue slate dark blue blue slate dark blue,off white paper red overprint red o/p + purple o/p red overprint red overprint

40. GLAAD: Canadian Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Spousal Rights; U.S. Supreme Cou On May 20, 1999, the canadian supreme court found an Ontario law, whichdefined the term. GLAAD Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation. http://www.glaad.org/publications/archive_detail.php?id=635

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Page 2     21-40 of 107    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6  | Next 20