Geometry.Net - Basic_R: Racial Equality & The Law


Home - Basic_R - Racial Equality & The Law

e99.com Bookstore

Images

Newsgroups

21-40 of 98 Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next 20

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Racial Equality & The Law: more books (64)

Code of Practice for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination in Education: Scotland by Commission for Racial Equality, 1991-12
The Appearance of Equality: Racial Gerrymandering, Redistricting, and the Supreme Court (Contributions in Legal Studies) by Christophe M. Burke, 1999-06-30
Color Blind Justice: Albion Tourgée and the Quest for Racial Equality from the Civil War to Plessy v. Ferguson by Mark Elliott, 2008-11-30
Unfinished Business: Racial Equality in American History (Inalienable Rights) by Michael J. Klarman, 2007-10-01
From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality.(Book Review): An article from: Stanford Law Review by Clayborne Carson, 2005-03-01
International human rights law perspective on Grutter and Gratz.(From Brown to Bakke to Grutter: Constitutionalizing and Defining Racial Equality): An article from: Constitutional Commentary by David Weissbrodt, 2004-03-22
Grutter or otherwise: racial preferences and higher education.(From Brown to Bakke to Grutter: Constitutionalizing and Defining Racial Equality): An article from: Constitutional Commentary by Larry Alexander, Maimon Schwarzschild, 2004-03-22
Tacking left: a radical critique of Grutter.(From Brown to Bakke to Grutter: Constitutionalizing and Defining Racial Equality): An article from: Constitutional Commentary by Daria Roithmayr, 2004-03-22
Race matters: this year, the Supreme Court could dismantle affirmative action. Would it be ending an unfair practice or hurting the cause of racial equality?: An article from: New York Times Upfront by Eric Nagourney, 2003-02-21
RACIAL EQUALITY: An entry from Charles Scribner's Sons' <i>New Dictionary of the History of Ideas</i> by Gregory Streich, 2005
Some Measures to Achieve Racial Equality in South Africa 1996-2000 by Grete Bosch, 2009-09-10
No easy road to freedom: remapping the struggle for racial equality.: An article from: Social Justice by Anthony M. Platt, 1995-09-22
The last twenty five years of affirmative action?(From Brown to Bakke to Grutter: Constitutionalizing and Defining Racial Equality): An article from: Constitutional Commentary by Kevin R. Johnson, 2004-03-22
The EU Race Directive: Developing the Protection against Racial Discrimination within the EU by Erica Howard, 2009-12-03

lists with details

Encyclopaedia Of USA History: The Struggle For Civil Rights
Institute, Southern Poor law Centre. Montgomery Bus Boycott, Freedom Riders. Lynchingof Emmett Till, Segregated Lunch Counters. SCLC, Congress of racial equality.
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAcivilrights.htm
16 Racial Discrimination Your Legal Rights
unlawful. This law also says that government departments and other publicorganisations must have policies to promote racial equality.
http://www.justask.org.uk/legalhelp/leaflet16.jsp?section=3&lang=null
16 Racial Discrimination Your Legal Rights
2. When discrimination can happen. 3. What the law says. The website of CitizensAdvice Bureau (CABx). Commission for racial equality phone 020 7828 7022.
http://www.justask.org.uk/legalhelp/leaflet16.jsp?section=14&lang=null
Racial Equality
are so many people bent on promoting racemixing and racial equality? Because, itis Satans goal to have us violate our Heavenly Fathers law on mixing
http://www.wckkkk.com/eql.html

Extractions: Equality Double Standard Race War White people have practiced segregation throughout History. It is conclusive to believe this due to the fact the White Race has flourished throughout History rather than dwindling such as we are during this time of accepted race-mixing. The inequalities of the Races have never been more apparent than that in the Bible. Here are just a few Bible scriptures: Exodus 33:16 "So shall we be separated: I and thy people, from all the people that are upon the face of the Earth" Leviticus 20:24 " I am the Lord they God which have separated you from other people" Joshua 23:12-13 "If you do in any way go back and cleave unto the remnants of these Nations, even these that remain among you, and shall make marriages with them, and go in unto them and they unto you: Know for a certainty That there shall be snares and traps unto you, and scourges in your side and thornes in your eyes. Until ye perish off from this good land which the Lord your God has given you." The list goes on and on: Deuteronomy 7:3, Proverbs 23:27, Psalm 144:11-12, Hosea 5:6-7. So We, the True Chosen people of God, the True Tribes of Israel, are commanded not to Race mix. We are NOT EQUAL IN THE EYES OF YAHWEH.
Kirklees Racial Equality Council
redresses the limitations of the original race legislation and gives public bodiesa positive, enforceable duty to promote racial equality. This new law is the
http://www.kirklees-rec.com/annualreport2001/chaireport.htm

Extractions: Kirklees Racial Equality Council On behalf of the Executive Committee, I am pleased to submit the Annual Report of Kirklees Racial Equality Council for your consideration and approval. Last year has been a year of consolidation, innovation and managing change. Our Director Maqsood Ahmad left us in June 2000, to take-up a two-year secondment with Her Majestys Inspectorate as an Inspector of Police. Jamil Akhtar (Racial Harassment Officer) acted-up and did an excellent job. Anila Roohi joined us last November as the Director and has settled in well. Our organisation has continued to provide high quality services to our clients and the community. High quality project work continues with the African Caribbean Partnerships; Racial Harassment; Complainant Aid and Employment; Youth and Education; Race, Ethnicity and Health; New Deal; Student Placements, Community Development and Advice Work. Kirklees Racial Equality Council prides itself working in partnership for a just a just society. Emphasising collective responsibility, Kirklees Racial Equality Council organised a conference Dealing With Racial Harassment And Institutionalised Racism in partnership with the Multi-Agency Racial Harassment Panel.
Your Rights: The Right Not To Be Discriminated Against: Race Discrimination: Com
Promoting equality of opportunity and good relations between persons of differentracial groups generally. of a formal investigation, that the law has been
http://www.yourrights.org.uk/your-rights/chapters/the-right-not-to-be-discrimina

Extractions: Search.. All of the site All of Your Rights Your Rights Chapters FAQ's Your Rights Peaceful Protest Free Expression Privacy The Right to Know How to get redress Suspects Defendants Prisoners Discrimination Immigrants People with Mental Disorder Children and Young People Workers Travellers The Protection of Property Rights Parents The Bereaved Victims and Witnesses of Crime Race Discrimination
Racial Equality Implementation Committee
Parties undertake to prohibit and to eliminate racial discrimination in all colour,or national or ethnic origin, to equality before the law, notably in
http://www.cba.org/CBA/Racial/Racial_Equality/UN_Special_Rapporteur_Racism.asp

Extractions: Submission to the UN Rapporteur on Racism, Doudou Diène (Regina, Saskatchewan, September 23, 2003) by David Matas Thank you for giving us the opportunity to make this presentation. The Task Force on Gender Equality was established in 1991 and reported in 1993. One of its recommendations was to conduct an inquiry into racism in the legal profession. The Canadian Bar Association adopted the recommendation in 1994 and appointed a working group on racial equality in the legal profession. I was appointed as one of the members of that working group. That working group reported in 1999. The Canadian Bar Association, that same year, decided to establish an implementation committee to implement the recommendations of that report. I am the current chair of that implementation committee.
Racial Equality Implementation Committee
Matas (MB), a former member of the Working Group on racial equality are acting as Refugee Board of Canada (ON); Charles Smith, Equity Advisor, law Society of
http://www.cba.org/CBA/Equality/Racial_Equality/

Extractions: In March 2000, the Racial Equality Implementation Committee (REIC) was struck to direct implementation of the 60 Racial Equality resolutions adopted by CBA National Council in August 1999 and February 2000. The resolutions are based on the recommendations that emanated from the February 1999 Report of the Working Group on Racial Equality entitled Racial Equality in the Canadian Legal Profession The REIC was created in response to Racial Equality resolution 53, which called on the CBA National Standing Committee on Equality to "establish a sub-committee to implement the recommendations of this report adopted by Council, which should reflect the diverse stakeholders who participated in the consultations of the Working Group on Racial Equality."
SSRN-Race And Equality Across The Law School Curriculum: Tax Exempt Law By David
Abstract Race and equality Across the law School Curriculum Tax Exempt law chroniclesthe possibilities for racial examinations of tax exempt law in the law
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=534562
SSRN-Intimacy And Racial Equality: The Limits Of Antidiscrimination By R. Banks
Banks, R. Richard, Intimacy and racial equality The Limits of Antidiscrimination . Harvard Civil RightsCivil Liberties law Review, Forthcoming http//ssrn
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=427873
Changes To The Law Against Racial Discrimination
This provision means that the law is clearer and that it will be of greater Or visitthe Commission for racial equalitys website at http//www.cre.gov.uk.
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs2/chngeagracdis.html

Extractions: Changes to the law against racial discrimination The Government is making important changes to the Race Relations Act. This is in line with changes to race legislation being made across the EU. The new legislation will give people greater protection from unlawful racial discrimination and harassment. The Race Relations Act 1976 protects people from racial discrimination in the fields of employment, education, training, housing and the provision of goods, facilities and services. Following the Race Relations (Amendment) Act in 2000, it prohibits racial discrimination in the carrying out of many public functions, including policing. The amended Act also places on most public authorities a general duty to promote race equality. Many of these authorities have to meet specific duties as well. The Government recently introduced regulations (The Race Relations Act 1976 (Amendment) Regulations 2003) that further improve the amended Race Relations Act. The regulations relate to discrimination and harassment on the grounds of race or ethnic or national origins (referred to in this leaflet as 'the relevant grounds') and will help to ensure that Britain meets minimum standards of legal protection from racial discrimination and harassment across Europe.
DEMOCRATS DON'T HAVE THE CONSTITUTION FOR RACIAL EQUALITY
state colleges are allowed to create a racial stew Liberals love this system of pretendlaw,because it allows them There is, however, an Equal Protection Clause
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/demoRcrat.htm

Extractions: January 22, 2003 ALL THE BLATHER Like everyone else in the universe, I too have strong opinions about how universities should run their admissions systems. But there is no Ann's Opinion Clause in the Constitution. There is, however, an Equal Protection Clause. The 14th Amendment to the Constitution prohibits states from discriminating on the basis of race. It says: Nor shall any state "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." That amendment grew out of the Republicans' first big dust-up with the Democrats over race – the Civil War . Then, as now, Democrats demanded the right to discriminate on the basis of race. The 14th Amendment sternly informed Democrats that they would have to stop. Democrats dropped slavery but desperately clung to state-sanctioned race discrimination for another hundred years. It took a Supreme Court ruling in 1954 and a Republican president sending in the National Guard to force Democrats to stop their infernal race discrimination. In the 1954 case Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court held that the Equal Protection Clause prohibited the states from engaging in race discrimination in education. Democrats responded with massive resistance.
For A Change Magazine: Racial Equality,Mississippi-style
racial equality,MISSISSIPPISTYLE. William Winter, one of the that Clinton undertookhis recent racial initiative on to receive his bachelor and law degrees from
http://www.forachange.co.uk/index.php?stoid=111
Wiltshire County Council Commitment To Anti-Racist Practices Statement
Sir William Macpherson of Cluny, 6 Commission for racial equalitys Standard forLocal Government. 7 Recommends producing one antidiscriminatory law and a
http://www.wiltshire.gov.uk/policy/equality.php3

Extractions: A to Z Statement of County Councils Commitment to Anti-Racist Practices We in Wiltshire believe and assert that all persons have the inalienable right to be treated with equal dignity, respect, consideration and without prejudice and to be given equal access to all our services without regard to race, colour, nation-ality, culture, languages spoken, religious beliefs, creed, ethnicity. We judge each person by his and her ideas, values, actions and character and not by his and her racial origins, religion, community or culture. Each of us is equal and different. We in Wiltshire County Council will not tolerate any form of discriminatory behaviour by our employees or by those using our services. We will take all external as well as internal complaints seriously and we will ensure that our procedures allow open, constructive and healthy challenge both from within as well as from outside the organisation. We in Wiltshire celebrate, encourage and enjoy the benefits that come from our peoples ethnic, cultural, language, religious and other diversities. We believe that our cultural diversity as well as our individual and communal differences enrich all our diverse communities within the community of Wiltshire. In order to ensure that we succeed in fulfiling our commitment to the inalienable right to equal access we, in Wiltshire, will:
NARA | Prologue | Prologue: Special Issue On Federal Records And African America
The passage of Public law 102526 in 1992 requiring government-wide of both Presidentswith civil rights leaders and opponents of racial equality provide an
http://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/summer_1997_equality_in_the_sixtie

Extractions: Where Is...? / How Do I...? Where Is...? Hot Topics / What's New The Constitution The Declaration of Independence The Bill of Rights Genealogy Veterans' Service Records Archival Research Catalog (ARC) Access to Archival Databases (AAD) eVetRecs Electronic Records Archives (ERA) Archives Library Info. Center (ALIC) Calendar of Events FAQs FOIA Reading Room Information Security Oversight Office Interagency Working Group (IWG) Locations and Hours (Facilities) Media Desk Organization Chart Preservation Prologue Magazine Publications How Do I...? Use this Site Order Copies Contact NARA Visit NARA Apply for a Job Volunteer at NARA Research Online Find a Public Law Apply for a Grant Find Records Management Training June 11, 2004 Sections Prologue Main Page Current Issue Special Issues American Civil War ... Selected Articles Resources Subscribe to Prologue Guidelines for Authors Archives of Previous Issues Other NARA Publications ... Search in Prologue Special Issue
Your Thoughts On Achieving National Security Via Racial Equality
remains our strongest argument for achieving full racial equality and eliminatingall become constituents of local, state or federal law enforcement supervision
http://home.pacbell.net/veterans/letstalk.htm

Extractions: American National Security via Racial Equality TOPIC: An Argument for Achieving Full Racial Equality in America Virtually all of humankind's wars and social conflicts are rooted in race, history's color-coded means of identifying economic competitors. The United States of America was created specifically to create a single nation democratically and spiritually open to all of God's self-image, the human race. Those among our Founding Fathers who argued bitterly for an end to slavery on our continent briefly compromised their desire for full equality for all so that the Colony representatives participating in the construction of our Constitutional and national government would first agree to unite... and, hopefully... later agree to abolish human subjection of one race by another. Their principle reason for compromise, amidst a bitter war against a hostile and brutal foreign power, was needed to solidify and guarantee American national security before we as a nation could guarantee full domestic security for each and every American living between our two shining seas. As history has recorded, it was only at that precise moment when our national security was guaranteed from foreign attack, in 1860, that we re-opened our national discussion for achieving domestic security. Unfortunately, uncompromising individuals and organizations in the South refused to end their unfair business practice of developing internationally competitive products produced from cost-free labor... in direct competition with their industrial competitors in the North. War broke out.
Racial Equality Directive
of play in each Member State on the implementation of the Race equality Directiveinto national law. Download PDF (angl.) racial equality Report_Germany 32 KB.
http://www.stop-discrimination.info/index.php?id=2669
Equality Before The Law And Discrimination
Where equality of outcome becomes the goal, the costs are soon promise (albeit slowly)of breaking down racial barriers whether they are victimised by law or by
http://www.ourcivilisation.com/cooray/rights/chap9.htm

Extractions: Human Rights In Australia by Doctor Mark Cooray 9.1 Equality Before The Law And Discrimination Differentiation And Discrimination The Problem Of Discretion Discrimination In Private Conduct Affirmative Action Discrimination And Commonsense Meanings Of "Equality" Considered Further The Moens Affair And The Human Rights Commission The New Meritocracy. NEXT Human Rights Main Contents Home 9.1 Differentiation And Discrimination Discrimination is an important public issue relevant to any analysis of human rights. There is a great deal of discussion on discrimination (much of it rhetoric) but inadequate rational analysis and understanding of the concept. Discrimination is a problem which arises in relation to equality before the law. All human beings are not equal in every respect. They are distinguishable not only by physical and mental attributes but also by their particular circumstances. These manifold differences must inevitably lead to acts which involve what appears to be discrimination. Few will disagree with the proposition that a young child cannot be given the same rights or subjected to the same duties as an adult. Likewise there are countless situations where one human being must be treated differently from another. What then is the freedom from discrimination? It is an aspect of equality before the law - and should rightly be viewed in that context.
Democrats Don't Have The Constitution For Racial Equality
Democrats Don t Have The Constitution For racial equality January 22, 2003 printer Noweveryone treats constitutional law as if it is an ongoing referendum
http://www.anncoulter.org/columns/2003/012203.htm

Extractions: The 14th Amendment to the Constitution prohibits states from discriminating on the basis of race. It says: Nor shall any state "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." That amendment grew out of the Republicans' first big dust-up with the Democrats over race – the Civil War . Then, as now, Democrats demanded the right to discriminate on the basis of race. The 14th Amendment sternly informed Democrats that they would have to stop. Democrats dropped slavery but desperately clung to state-sanctioned race discrimination for another hundred years.
Your Legal Rights: At The Police Station - Connexions North London
racial equality. In criminal law it is an offence to incite racial hatred, includingthreats, abuse and insults which are made (or likely) to stir up racial
http://www.connexions-northlondon.co.uk/site/text/the-law-and-you/your-legal-rig

Extractions: Racial Equality In criminal law it is an offence to incite racial hatred, including threats, abuse and insults which are made (or likely) to stir up racial hatred. The offence also covers publication and distribution of offensive written and visual material. There are also special provisions for football matches. If somebody makes a racially motivated physical or verbal attack on you this is usually dealt with as an assault under the criminal law. If you believe someone is committing an offence by inciting racial hatred, you should inform the police immediately. If you observe an incident it is important to try and remember details of the event. Write them down if you can as soon after they happened. Note the times, places, numbers of people and their descriptions if you can. If you believe the police did not respond quickly or seriously enough, you can complain to the Police Complaints Authority.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

21-40 of 98 Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next 20