Extractions: The Web CNN.com Home Page World U.S. Weather ... Special Reports SERVICES Video E-Mail Services CNNtoGO SEARCH Web CNN.com Story Tools RESOURCES Sex offender registries SPECIAL REPORT Supreme Court justices profiles Supreme Court's notable cases Tour of the Supreme Court Supreme Court preview ... Justices' long tenure brings stability, speculation on retirement WASHINGTON (AP) The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that photos of convicted sex offenders may be posted on the Internet, a victory for states that use the Web to warn citizens about potential predators in their neighborhoods. In a separate ruling, the court turned back a challenge from sex offenders who argued they deserved a chance to prove they aren't dangerous to avoid having their pictures and addresses put on the Internet. The decisions came in the Supreme Court's first review of what are known as Megan's laws. They have far-reaching implications because every state and the federal government have sex-offender registry statutes. The laws are named for 7-year-old Megan Kanka, a New Jersey girl kidnapped, raped and killed in 1994 by a convicted sex criminal who lived in her neighborhood.
KuesterLaw Technology Law Resource - Patent Copyright Trademark CDA Found Unconstitutional by US supreme court 6/26/97 federal statutes, Rules, MPEP, TMEP USPTO Manual of Patent 7th ed. (Searchable); US Patent laws (35 USC http://www.kuesterlaw.com/kcasesta.htm
Federal Court Decisions on tribal lands, the US supreme court holds the for the alleged violation of the Tribe s rights under federal law. provisions in treaties and statutes, and the http://www.tribal-institute.org/lists/supreme.htm
Extractions: Tribal Court Clearinghouse SEARCH var MenuLinkedBy='AllWebMenus [2]', awmBN='456'; awmAltUrl=''; This page provides links to all Federal Courts and case summaries of Indian law cases decided by the United States Supreme Court from 1991 through 2003 with links to the court syllabus, the full opinions for each case, and all dissents. This page also contains information concerning Indian law cases pending before the U.S. Supreme Court during the current term. United States v. Lara (No. 03107) Question: Whether tribal governments have inherent sovereignty over all American Indians, not just members of their own tribes? The Court holds that dual tribal and federal prosecution of Indian offenders does not violate the U.S. Constitution's ban on double jeopardy. Three Indian law cases were decided by the Supreme Court in the 2002-2003 term.
FindLaw: Cases And Codes Codes, statutes and Regulations US Constitution; US Code laws made by the US court of federal Claims - from George Washington University School of Law. http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/
Extractions: FindLaw Legal Professionals Students Business ... Lawyer Search State AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AS GU MP PR VI Select a Practice Area Administrative Law Adoption Agriculture Law Alternative Dispute Resolution Animal Bites Asbestos Mesothelioma Aviation Bankruptcy Law Business Organizations Child Support Civil Rights Constitutional Law Construction Law Consumer Protection Contracts Criminal Law Criminal Law Federal Debtor/Creditor Discrimination Divorce DUI/DWI Education Law Elder Law Eminent Domain Employment Law Employee Employment Law Employer Energy Law Environmental Law Estate Planning Family Law Franchising Gaming Law Government Contracts Insurance Law Intellectual Property Law International Law Internet Cyberspace Labor Law Landlord/Tenant Legal Malpractice Lemon Law Medical Malpractice Military Law Motor Vehicle Accidents Motor Vehicle Defects Native Peoples Law Natural Resources Law Nursing Home Patents Personal Injury Defense Personal Injury Premises Liability Products Liability Law Professional Malpractice Law Real Estate Law Securities Law Sexual Harassment Social Security Disability Taxation Law Toxic Substances Trademarks Traffic Violations Transportation Law Trusts Wills Workers' Compensation Law Wrongful Death Document Library Legal Dictionary Legal News FindLaw Legal Web Sites All Web Sites US Government Sites US Supreme Court All Circuit Courts US Constitution FindLaw Newsletters Top Legal News Headlines
Welcome To The Legal Information Institute of federal Regulations. federal Rules federal Rules of Evidence laws. State Constitutions Codes. court opinions. US supreme court Opinions. Other federal court Opinions. New York court http://www.law.cornell.edu/
Extractions: @import url(css/menu.css); site awards tell me more donate Text (pdf) of the US Army report on treatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib, "ARTICLE 15-6 INVESTIGATION OF THE 800th MILITARY POLICE BRIGADE", prepared by Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba Senate Armed Services Committee testimony via C-SPAN (Real Media or SMIL formats) Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld (.rm) Maj. General Antonio M. Taguba
Washlaw WEB -- Full-Text Searching supreme court Records and Briefs (The Lillian Goldman Law Library at the Yale Law School); FedLaw; USSCPLUS site. federal Executive Law. federal statutes. http://www.washlaw.edu/searchlaw.html
LII: Law About...Bankruptcy sections of Title 11 incorporate the debtorcreditor law of the federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure; Official Bankruptcy Forms; US supreme court State statutes. http://www.law.cornell.edu/topics/bankruptcy.html
Extractions: Law About . . . collection home search tell me more LII home ... donate Bankruptcy law provides for the development of a plan that allows a debtor, who is unable to pay his creditors, to resolve his debts through the division of his assets among his creditors. This supervised division also allows the interests of all creditors to be treated with some measure of equality. Certain bankruptcy proceedings allow a debtor to stay in business and use revenue generated to resolve his or her debts. An additional purpose of bankruptcy law is to allow certain debtors to free themselves (to be discharged) of the financial obligations they have accumulated, after their assets are distributed, even if their debts have not been paid in full. Bankruptcy law is federal statutory law contained in Title 11 of the United States Code. Congress passed the Bankruptcy Code under its Constitutional grant of authority to "establish. . . uniform laws on the subject of Bankruptcy throughout the United States." See U.S. Constitution Article I, Section 8.
OSCN: The Oklahoma Supreme Court Network 19972004 by the supreme court of Oklahoma. All For more New decisions, click here. supreme court of Oklahoma violence as provided by federal law, which would prevent issuance http://www.oscn.net/
Extractions: OSCN navigation is via clickable links. For a full list of the documents available on OSCN, click on the Legal Research button above on the black toolbar. To search the docket system click on the Court Dockets button on the black toolbar. To retrieve a document by citation, type the citation in the QuickCase box and click Go. To search the Legal Materials site, click on the Legal Research button on the black toolbar and then click on Search in the left-side navigation column. Today's Events
Legal Resources At Your Fingertips SEARCH supreme court decisions GENERAL LEGAL RESOURCES Miscellaneous list of useful federal and State PUBLICATIONS Electronically published law journals and http://www.lawinfo.com/links/
Law Collection: W.E.B. Du Bois Library Northwestern University) Oral arguments from the supreme court. Research/federal Case Law/court of Appeals; federal statutes United States Code Annotated All http://www.library.umass.edu/subject/law/lawfed.html
Notable Decisions Of The U.S. Supreme Court, 19981999 Term 16, 1998) supreme court justices reject moves by Ohio and rule, 63, that Chicago statute, aimed at They rule that federal law sacrifices an intolerable http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0771556.html
Extractions: History and Government Supreme Court School Voucher Ruling Stands (Nov. 9, 1998): Supreme Court justices avoid decision on whether taxpayer-financed vouchers may be used to send children to parochial schools. Plan was upheld by state court in Wisconsin. Administration Appeals Rejected (Nov. 9, 1998): Justices bar two Clinton moves to block grand jury testimony by Secret Service agents and President's lawyer in investigation of Monica Lewinsky affair. Campaign Finance Appeals Rejected (Nov. 16, 1998): Supreme Court justices reject moves by Ohio and Arkansas questioning limits on political spending and contributions. Police Search Powers Limited (Dec. 8, 1998): Justices rule unanimously that issuing a speeding ticket does not automatically give police right to search car. Workers Protected in Testifying (Dec. 14, 1998):
Opinion Of The Supreme Court In United States Vs Price (1966) The present application of the statutes at issue does not of life or liberty without due process of law. a direct, traditional concern of the federal Government http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/price&bowers/sctdecision.html
Extractions: 383 U.S. 787 UNITED STATES v. PRICE ET AL. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 383 U.S. 787; 86 S. Ct. 1152; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1963 November 9, 1965, Argued March 28, 1966, Decided COUNSEL: Solicitor General Marshall argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Doar, Louis F. Claiborne and Gerald P. Choppin. H. C. Mike Watkins argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Dennis Goldman, Laurel G. Weir and Herman Alford. JUDGES: Warren, Fortas, Harlan, Brennan, Black, Stewart, Clark, White, Douglas MR. JUSTICE FORTAS delivered the opinion of the Court. The sole question presented in these appeals is whether the specified statutes make criminal the conduct for which the individuals were indicted. It is an issue of construction, not of constitutional power. We have no doubt of "the power of Congress to enforce by appropriate criminal sanction every right guaranteed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment." [The indictment alleges that] on June 21, 1964, Cecil Ray Price, the Deputy Sheriff of Neshoba County, Mississippi, detained Michael Henry Schwerner, James Earl Chaney and Andrew Goodman in the Neshoba County jail located in Philadelphia, Mississippi. He released them in the dark of that night. He then proceeded by automobile on Highway 19 to intercept his erstwhile wards. He removed the three men from their automobile, placed them in an official automobile of the Neshoba County Sheriff's office, and transported them to a place on an unpaved road.
Michigan/Laws, Regulations, And Court Decisions for each topic includes federal laws, regulations, and Ethnic Intimidation Statute Hate Crimes (Michigan Legislature Research/State Case Law/Michigan; Search http://www.lib.umich.edu/govdocs/michlaw.html
Extractions: Material for women, children, seniors Individual Laws as Originally Passed Michigan Public and Local Acts, 1837+ Annual compilation of laws as passed Issues for 1837-1979 in Buhr Storage; 1980+ in Documents Center as Doc. Cen. M .M62 A2 Michigan Legislature Provides indexes of Michigan Compiled Laws and the Public Acts updating them List of Public Acts with corresponding bill number, date signed, date effective and sponsor
Landmark Court Decisions 1868) Congress may remove jurisdiction from the supreme court. and is exempt from campaign disclosure statute. the guns he possessed, federal law may use http://www.constitution.org/ussc/usscdeci.htm
Extractions: Click on the button to get the indicated file format: HTML Text WP PDF RTF Word Image Rating Wrong Correct Mixed Decision Opinion Georgia v. Brailsford Calder v. Bull ex post facto laws. Marbury v. Madison U.S. v. Burr United States v. Hudson McCulloch v. Maryland Gibbons v. Ogden Games v. Stiles ex dem Dunn Ex Parte Milligan Ex Parte McCardle U. S. v. Hall Hurtado v. California Logan v. U.S. Coffin v. U.S. Lochner v. New York Twining v. New Jersey
New Hampshire Law Library material from all 50 states including statutes and court as federal court decisions and federal administrative agency The law library also has a collection of http://www.courts.state.nh.us/lawlibrary/
Extractions: FAX: (603) 271 - 2168 The New Hampshire Law Library is the only public law library in the state. Its mission is to advance the administration of justice by providing legal information and related services to the judicial, legislative, and executive branches of government, the legal communities of New Hampshire, and the people of the state. History In 1716, a collection of law books belonging to the provincial government formed the first state library collection. After the State House was built in 1816, a room was set aside for the library. For a time, the Secretary of State also served as the State Librarian. In 1895, a separate building was constructed to house the State Library and the New Hampshire Supreme Court. In1943, the State Library separated out its legal materials and created a Law Division of the State Library. It served as the law library for many years. In 1970, the current Supreme Court building was constructed, and the Law Division of the State Library moved, along with the New Hampshire Supreme Court, to the Supreme Court building.
BASIC LEGAL RESEARCH FEDERAL LAWS AND COURT CASES federal laws and court cases are available fulltext on the to Advanced Searching and Search Tips federal Legal Research text of both the US statutes at Large http://www.unk.edu/acad/library/gov_doc/fedlawct.htm
Extractions: AND COURT CASES Return to Government Documents Home Page Return to Basic Research FEDERAL LAWS Laws from the federal government are in two sets of documents, the U.S. Code , and the United States Statutes at Large U.S. Code *Y 1.2/5:(volume), Documents Reference Collection The U.S. Code contains federal laws that are currently in force. It is arranged by broad subjects called " Titles ." There are fifty titles or subject divisions in the set. The U.S. Code is reprinted at six year intervals and updated during the interim with supplements. Use the set if you need the federal laws about something, i.e., laws about aviation, child abuse, civil rights, education, persons with disabilities, etc. Look in the index volumes for your subject. The index will give a citation that looks like this: DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION, CONTROL AND TREATMENT personnel 21 § 878 The first number is the title or broad subject and the second is the section within that title. Title numbers are on the spine of the volumes. Find the volume with the title you want; then look at the top of the pages to locate the title and section. After you have looked up the title and section you need, check the same citation in the newest supplement to see if the law has been changed. Even with the supplements, the laws in the U. S. Code
Extractions: From the July 2000 Idaho Observer: Petition to Supreme Court reveals existence of concealed wage tax Courts and Justice Department conspire to allow government collection of unconstitutional tax Is the income tax on wages an illegal extortion racket? Irwin Schiff has filed a Petition of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court. He claims that he has uncovered evidence that Congressional treachery from 1943 enables the federal government to justify deducting an unconstitional tax on your wages. Whether or not the high court ever hears the petition may be up to you. LAS VEGAS The Petition For Certiorari (and Appendix) also reveal that Federal law, in America, is not enforced on the basis of statutes passed by Congress, but is enforced on the basis of erroneous court decisions known to be false by the federal judges who hand them down. In 1943, while America was engaged in WWII, the government, for the first time, sought to collect income taxes from America's working middle class. Up until then, only wealthy Americans paid income taxes, and they did so by making lump sum payments (or three installment payments) by March 15th of the year following that taxable year - i.e. 1938 income taxes were paid in 1939. In doing so, Judge Pro ignored some 40 statutes and numerous court decisions, all of which establish that assessments are a condition precedent to the owing of income taxes. In addition, Judge Pro refused to even address Browns' claim that, pursuant to Code Section 31(a)(1), they were entitled to a refund of all the wage taxes they had paid. In not addressing this issue, Judge Pro denied the Browns the protection of three constitutional provisions along with the specific statutes that guaranteed them the refund.
Extractions: OAS_AD('Top'); High Court Decisions Stump Free-Speech Advocates Wednesday, July 02, 2003 Supreme Court search OAS_AD('Middle'); First Amendment search The Walt Disney Co. Nike Inc. , that had given the court a chance to give broader protection to commercial speech. The court refused to decide whether Nike's claim that its ads and statements defending overseas labor practices were constitutionally protected free speech - not false advertising as a California activist alleged. The issue could return to the court. "It's not a disastrous First Amendment year, but certainly one that gives no cheer to First Amendment advocates," said New York attorney Floyd Abrams, a free-speech expert. Some of the cases were easy for the court, like the unanimous ruling that states can crack down on telemarketing fraud without stepping on the free speech rights of charities. That ruling allows states to pursue fund-raisers who misrepresent how donations will be used. Three times previously, the court had struck down regulations on charity fund-raisers. The court also ruled 9-0 that the government may designate crime-ridden public housing neighborhoods as off limits to visitors and prosecute some trespassers. A lower court had ruled that the trespassing ordinance harmed people who had legitimate, free-speech reasons for visiting public housing.
FOXNews.com - Top Stories - Historic Supreme Court Decisions the court not only to interpret the constitutionality of a law or statute, but also Maryland involved a federal agency set up by Congress which the state of http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,618,00.html
Extractions: In a deeply divided case, Allan Bakke, a white male, applied to the University of California at Davis Medical School. He did not meet the standard entrance requirements and was turned away. He argued a case of reverse discrimination because only black, Hispanic and Asian students could compete for a set number of spots reserved for minorities who did not meet the standard entrance requirements. The court ended up supporting Bakke's claim, while approving the use of race as one of the criteria in selecting applicants. FNC Alerts News Ticker Schedule Bios ... Advertise on FOX News Channel, FOXNews.com and FOX News Radio
Extractions: SECTION: ENVIRONMENTAL LAW; Pg. S35 LENGTH: 2888 words HEADLINE: A RACE-BASED WASTE CASE BYLINE: GERALD H. YAMADA BODY: A recent 3rd Circuit decision would allow Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to be used under the rubric of "environmental justice" to challenge local land use decisions and private business activities that otherwise could not be reviewed under state or federal laws. The Supreme Court should grant certiorari and reverse this potentially far-reaching precedent. Seif v. Chester Residents Concerned for Quality Living, 132 F.3d 925, petition for cert. filed, No. 97-1620 (March 30, 1998). The predominantly African-American residents of Chester
